[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference csc32::consolemanager

Title:POLYCENTER Console Manager
Notice:Kits, Scans, Docs on CSC32:: as PCM$KITS:,PCM$DOCS:, PCM$SCANS:
Moderator:CSC32::BUTTERWORTH
Created:Thu Aug 06 1992
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1541
Total number of notes:6564

331.0. "daemon fails to use a VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE licnese" by CX3PST::ANASAZ::J_BECKER (There's no substitute for a good boot) Thu Aug 04 1994 01:19


I had a customer today install 1.5 on a vax system.  He previously had VCS on
the node so the VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE license was there.  There was no
POLY-CONSOLEMGR license.  The daemons would not startup.  Enabling DEBUG we 
found the daemon process did not load any licenses.  

The VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE license was 0 unit, constant=100, product release date
of 1-DEC-1991.  I disabled this and loaded a 50 unit, activity=f, no release 
date and it worked.  Are there some VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE licenses that will not
work?  Does the release date have to be after certain date?

thanks
john becker
csc/cs
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
331.1CSC32::BUTTERWORTHGun Control is a steady hand.Thu Aug 04 1994 01:3512
    >The VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE license was 0 unit, constant=100, product
    >release date of 1-DEC-1991.  I disabled this and loaded a 50 unit, 
    >activity=f, no release date and it worked.  Are there some 
    >VAXCLUSTER-CONSOLE licenses that will not
    >work?  Does the release date have to be after certain date?
    
    Looks like you just found one and it makes sense. The product release
    date is obviously earlier than the release date for PCM hence it didn't
    accept it. Was it a TSP or a SUP?
    
    Regs,
      Dan
331.2SUPCX3PST::ANASAZ::J_BECKERThere's no substitute for a good bootThu Aug 04 1994 19:256
>    accept it. Was it a TSP or a SUP?


		sup!

jb