| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 284.1 | Flag this with out Product Mgr | OPG::SIMON | | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:47 | 8 |
| Hi,
please flag this with our product mgr
Rae Kung (Muzick::kung)
She will have thew prices and should ensure that this issue is resolved.
cheers Simon.....
|
| 284.2 | $ and PACS | MUZICK::KUNG | | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:04 | 17 |
| Reply has been sent to Marc. The pricing across platforms is the
same: $74,400 for unlimited license, $698 for concurrent.
I will check with PACS system (after I find the right contact person)
to make sure the pricing gets in there.
Question about concurrent licensing, just to make sure I've got it
right:
If a customer wants to monitor 30 systems/devices from his console,
but only 15 of them at any one time simultaneously, he still has
to purchase 30 concurrent licenses, correct? Or can he get away
with purchasing 15, and switch the devices that are being monitored
around?
Thanks,
Rae
|
| 284.3 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Tue Jun 21 1994 19:05 | 18 |
| Rae,
>> If a customer wants to monitor 30 systems/devices from his console,
>> but only 15 of them at any one time simultaneously, he still has
>> to purchase 30 concurrent licenses, correct? Or can he get away
>> with purchasing 15, and switch the devices that are being monitored
>> around?
The customer can get away with purchasing 15, they will have to enable
the systems they need to access in the database, disabling the ones
they dont, then perform a reconfigure in order to manage the newly
enabled systems.
Why would the customer want to do it this way? Its not as though the
licenses are expensive!!
Cheers,
Phil
|
| 284.4 | | CSC32::BUTTERWORTH | Gun Control is a steady hand. | Tue Jun 21 1994 20:25 | 7 |
| >Why would the customer want to do it this way? Its not as though the
>licenses are expensive!!
If you knew how cheap some customers are you wouldn't be asking this
question. ;-}
Dan
|
| 284.5 | | MUZICK::KUNG | | Tue Jun 21 1994 23:16 | 15 |
| Dan is right... :)
Thanks for the quick response, Phil. You folks are giving the
Scheduler team a run for their money in response time for notesfile
questions.
Ann and I also talked about the concept of a "backup" license, where
the product would be installed on a backup system, and would only be
started up if the primary console system failed. The backup system
would then need to check and see if the primary one is running and if
so it would shut itself down. Lots more to work out there, but it
was a thought.
Thanks,
Rae
|
| 284.6 | | CSC32::BUTTERWORTH | Gun Control is a steady hand. | Wed Jun 22 1994 01:27 | 10 |
| >The backup system would then need to check and see if the primary one is
>running and if so it would shut itself down. Lots more to work out there,
>but it was a thought.
Interesting idea especially since Phil and the gang have already coded
some hooks into the exisiting version to accomodate an active fail-over
environment, i.e., the primary and secondary watch each other.
Regs,
dan
|