| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 230.1 | Suppoerted | ZENDIA::DBIGELOW | Innovate, Integrate, Evaporate | Fri Apr 01 1994 16:23 | 7 |
| Marc,
The current kit works on OSF/1. It was just released yesterday.
Cheers,
Dave
|
| 230.2 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Fri Apr 01 1994 20:52 | 7 |
| Marc,
As Dave says, the current kits works, well, it does for us, maybe for you
things will be different ;-) But I am sure you will let us know.
Cheers,
Phil
|
| 230.3 | Great ... will test this asap ... | 54831::SYBERTZ | Marc Sybertz@BRO - DTN 856-7572 | Tue Apr 05 1994 10:54 | 0 |
| 230.4 | Use OSF V1.3 or V2.0 with PCM V1.1? | 54697::han | Questions raise the doubt | Tue Apr 26 1994 22:23 | 5 |
| Any progress on this? (DEC OSF/1 V2.0 with PCM V1.1)
If this is supposed to work like .1 seems to suggest then is there any
technical reason why the SSB kit announcement (note 2.19) still
explicitly states that DEC OSF/1 V1.3 is required?
|
| 230.5 | Works!! | OPG::SIMON | | Wed Apr 27 1994 09:47 | 12 |
| Hi,
sorry I guess my wording in the kit announcement was wrong. We require at
least OSF/1 V1.3.
We have done testing against OSF/1 V2.0 and things appear OK.
"I fixed an install problem with subset dependancy checking in an earlier FT
so no probs there.
Use V2.0 and we will support it!!
Cheers Simon...
|
| 230.6 | Works!! | OPG::SIMON | | Wed Apr 27 1994 09:47 | 12 |
| Hi,
sorry I guess my wording in the kit announcement was wrong. We require at
least OSF/1 V1.3.
We have done testing against OSF/1 V2.0 and things appear OK.
"I fixed an install problem with subset dependancy checking in an earlier FT
so no probs there.
Use V2.0 and we will support it!!
Cheers Simon...
|