T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
90.1 | Console/Event Message Reports | LTLKNG::ZIGLER | Tom Zigler DTN:432-7541 | Sat Aug 28 1993 16:18 | 39 |
| We need to be able to analyze the console and/or event message
log and/or archive files and generate summary reports that indicate how
well we are doing regarding the remote management of our customer's
systems.
This is a HIGH priority need which the CM V1.1 release does not
seem to address (CM Engineers, correct me if I am wrong regarding this
point).
As I see it, our contractual requirement can be met in CM V1.0 only by:
1) Action Routine
Write an action routine that writes console/event messages to a disk
file for every/selected console/event message received. However, this
option would unduly stress the CM system and create yet another disk file
consuming more disk space and requiring additional management.
However, software tools could be used to massage this data in a variety
of ways to produce a variety of reports.
2) Pass Console/Event Messages to External Software Package
Write an action routine that gets triggered for every/designated console
and/or event messages and passes this data to an external software package.
For example, place a DECalert RUDEM call into the action routine, pass
the data to DECalert, and then generate summary reports from the
DECalert ISAM file.
Are there other options? We believe that Option #2 is the better
approach with less stress on CM and less CM management overhead.
I would appreciate feedback from both CM engineering and others who may
be faced with this same problem - what are your thoughts?
Please advise.
/Thanks in Advance
|
90.2 | events without highlighted icons | BLKPUD::HUTCHINSONC | | Fri Nov 12 1993 15:14 | 11 |
| I have a customer who wants to place an event with an ENS action
routine into his VCS profile. However he does not want the event to be
displayed on the C3 screen (ie. he wants to detect a string of text on
the console, not highlight the icon but still run the action routine).
As VCS V1.4 does not support this hes asked me to put it on a wish
list.
Regards
Christina Hutchinson
|
90.3 | | ELGIN::RASOOLM | The computer in front is an ALPHA | Fri Dec 09 1994 10:24 | 10 |
|
I need to have control on whether the events window pops up alongside
the c3 interface or not.
Something like "$ console c3/noevent_window" is what I am thinking of.
Regards,
Max.
|
90.4 | It helps if you look before you ask. | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Fri Dec 09 1994 12:27 | 7 |
| Max,
Have you looked under Opetions->General... there you will find an option
called "Display EventlistWindow at startup".
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.5 | It's for my colleagues | ELGIN::RASOOLM | The computer in front is an ALPHA | Fri Dec 09 1994 17:14 | 18 |
|
Phil,
Yep, I have already taken advantage of that facility for myself.
The reason I put it into a wishlist is because on system startup, I
have set up a batch job that will create a c3 window on about half a
dozen of my colleagues workstations. Instead of running round explaining
what they have to do to remove the events window, I would like to have
it as an option at that level.
Sorry for not explaining myself properly again! 8-)
Regards,
Max.
|
90.6 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Fri Dec 09 1994 17:41 | 10 |
| Max,
So, are all the C3's the same view? If so, do it once and copy the
CONSOLE$C3.DAT around to everyone else.
Also, what do you propose we do if your colleagues want the evntlist
displayed at startup, but you have turned it off?
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.7 | Security ?! | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Fri Dec 09 1994 18:15 | 12 |
|
Max,
On a different tack, you do realise that by fireing the c3 display
to remote workstations you have a potential security hole.
If the workstation is being used by "somebody" else (either intentionally
or otherwise), by sending the c3 you will be giving them access to the
consoles of your systems ?! and hence allowing them to halt them.
Andy.
|
90.8 | Just a thought | ZENDIA::DBIGELOW | Innovate, Integrate, Evaporate | Fri Dec 09 1994 20:58 | 9 |
| Another possibility for plugging the security hole would be to
optionally have the user enter a password when he/she connects.
Each system could have it's own password or a global password
for all systems, much like the way the Terminal Server Manager
works today. Just a thought for the next version.
Dave
|
90.9 | Nice Feature | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Sat Dec 10 1994 12:50 | 4 |
|
Dave,
I like the idea ....Andy.
|
90.10 | | CSC32::BUTTERWORTH | Gun Control is a steady hand. | Mon Dec 12 1994 21:17 | 7 |
| You could also implement the display security feature that VCS had.
That was a nice feature and customers found it simple to setup and
understand. I like the password protect on the connect too. I think
implementing both would be excellent.
Regs,
Dan
|
90.11 | | ELGIN::RASOOLM | The computer in front is an ALPHA | Tue Dec 13 1994 09:55 | 21 |
| Re .6
Phil,
Actually, as it is being done on startup, using the system account,
any change that is made and saved should be passed onto the rest of the
team.
Andy... re .7,
I understand your concerns, but I do not view it as any more of a risk
than having the c3 window just on my workstation. My colleagues do all
the right things in pausing workstations when leaving their desks
etc....
However, the subsequent security recomendations leading from your reply
have much merit.
Regards,
Max.
|
90.12 | Background maps and zoom | UTROP1::RIJSBERGEN_M | Marcel Rijsbergen @uto | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:00 | 6 |
|
- Put a map in the background and put icons upon it.
- if you have a LOT of nodes/buildings make some sort of zoom in
function to zoom into you maps (DECmcc like) and have the top-map
display priority colors.
|
90.13 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:32 | 8 |
| Marcel,
We have this now!! We are just putting the finishing touches to it
before we let it out for testing. Stay tuned....
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.14 | | WOTVAX::ELLISM | Are you all sitting too comfybold square on your botty? - Then w | Thu Jan 05 1995 12:41 | 9 |
| I think it would be rather nice to enable an event to clear another
one - some kind of event association. That is say I get an event that
SLS has stopped, then it restarts - the restart message should clear
the stopped message automaticaly.
This would require an extra field in the database, but I think would be
a good feature to have.
Martin
|
90.15 | Is this what you want? | OPG::SIMON | | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:30 | 9 |
| Martin,
the concept of Ack and Clear has been extended for the next
release ( if plans go as we hope). In that case events will be able to
be Acked and Cleared and the time,User and some associated text will
be logged.
Is that what you were hoping for?
Cheers Simon...
|
90.16 | | WOTVAX::ELLISM | Are you all sitting too comfybold square on your botty? - Then w | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:03 | 25 |
| Simon,
I know it has been extended, what I'm looking for is something like :-
ADD_EVENT:
NAME: SLS_STOPPED
TEXT: "SLS has Stopped"
etc.
END_EVENT
ADD_EVENT:
NAME: SLS_STARTED
TEXT: "SLS has restarted"
etc.
CLEAR: SLS_STOPPED
END_EVENT
This would mean that when the event SLS_STARTED occurred, it would
clear any event, in the same cluster/group, with the name SLS_STOPPED.
This would be done automaticaly. You may also want to put in some extra
stuff like the text you would like displayed, etc.
OK? Want to talk about this off line?
Martin
|
90.17 | | OPG::SIMON | | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:29 | 7 |
| Martin,
yes we can talk about this offline, but t occurs to me it is
rather like an extension the the stuff being done in the OSCInt Expert
Filter. It may be more relevant to incorporate it there. anyway we can
speak more later.
Cheers Simon...
|
90.18 | OSCint Enhancement Request | SUPER7::HUGHESA | Swimming against the tide @#%* | Thu Jan 05 1995 16:40 | 6 |
| Martin, Simon,
I did put this request in for OSCint v2, but it didn't make the final release,
perhaps a further request to Christian Heusbourg may raise the visibility.
Andy.
|
90.19 | | AZUR::HEUSBOURG | | Fri Jan 06 1995 11:31 | 15 |
|
Indeed Andy you asked for this functionality, instead of adding an event with
priority clear into ENS, having the OSCint Expert Filter 'clear' an event in
the event list. This feature is not in V2 as we were already in FT.
So indeed, as the OSCint Expert Filter is already designed to handle rules,
adding the functionality to 'clear' events will answer I think Martin's
request (with an extension to handle the notion of cluster/group).
The other possibility is to add the functionality into PCM, that's what Martin
proposed in .16, or another one would be to do both... Part of the answer will
also depend on how OSCint will evolve...
Cheers,
Christian.
|
90.20 | | WOTVAX::ELLISM | Are you all sitting too comfybold square on your botty? - Then w | Fri Jan 06 1995 17:52 | 5 |
| I don't care where it is, to be honest. I would 'prefer' it to be in
Console Manager, only because I feel happier when things are in
software funded from central engineering.
Martin
|
90.21 | Re-introduce 'displays' | SNOFS1::ELLISS | Are you all sitting too comfybold square on your botty? - Then w | Mon Mar 20 1995 23:54 | 15 |
| Hi chaps,
One of the nice things about ENS in VCS was the ability to create
objects called displays, and then associate displays with actions. This
meant that if someone moved, you only had to change the display record
and all the action routines would now send to the new location.
This does not seem possible in Console Manager, so I'd like to suggest
that you re-introduce this concept to PCM.
This would mean that wherever someone sat, they can get the messages
sent to their current position, as opposed to where it has been
hardcoded. Also, it makes change much easier.
Shaun
|
90.22 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Tue Mar 21 1995 12:32 | 7 |
| Martin,
Sorry, cant do, not in the near future anyway! I will place it on the
wishlist for the far future.
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.23 | Client/Server GUI? | KAOOSC::boivin | Moi, j'viens du nord! | Thu May 11 1995 19:25 | 21 |
| Good day,
We would like to see a client/server type GUI (much like DEC Scheduler)
where we can locally launch the GUI while connecting to remote PCM
Servers (no, X display doesn't cut it...). Here's why...
We have a central enterprise manager (Netview) getting events from DEC
internal and external (non-DEC) systems. That means we run *multiple*
copies of ConsoleManager on many different platforms (not just on the
Netview platform, we have VMS PCM and Unix PCM). We need the ability to
launch ConsoleManager from Netview even though the console we are
connecting to isn't managed by a "local" Consolemanager. This is why a
client/server GUI such as DECscheduler's would be good for us...
Any takers?
Thanks,
Ed
PS. I spoke to Rae Kung-Collier about this at IMSYM...
|
90.24 | | 45403::pgb | And through the square window... | Thu May 11 1995 19:33 | 14 |
| Ed,
You will need to submit a Phase 0 request for the next major PCM release when
(if?) that happens.
Having said that, it was something we were planning to do, but
things have gotten a little sidetracked. Your submission of a Phase 0 request to Rae
should ensure that this requirement gets the proper attention rather than just being
another item on our "wish-list"
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.25 | | SNOFS1::ELLISS | Are you all sitting too comfybold square on your botty? - Then we'll begin | Wed May 17 1995 07:32 | 10 |
| You could do it now, to a certain extent.
To the UNIX boxes you can use RSH (remote Shell) to fire off a command on the
PCM system to do whatever you want. The window will still be sent back from the
remote PCM system, but you launch it from netview. It is possible to do similar
with VMS systems as well.
Hope that helps
Shaun
|
90.26 | Enable TPU section file capability | 29159::D_DONOVAN | SummaNulla(The High Point of Nothing) | Thu Jun 15 1995 19:25 | 11 |
| Just received a request from a "former VCS" user to enhance PCM so
that he can use his TPU section file for key definitions within the MONITOR
interface. Dan B. showed me the use of the "CONSOLE$MONITOR_INIT.DAT" and
"CONSOLE$command.SCRIPT" files which will get back most of what he has lost
with the TPU section file key definitions (eg. "<PF1>1" for "VIEW NODE1")
but still thinks that being able to implement TPU section file functionality
would be a great enhancement to the product.
Thanks,
Dennis
|
90.27 | | OPG::PHILIP | And through the square window... | Fri Jun 16 1995 10:36 | 9 |
| Dennis,
If the monitor interface were built on TPU that would be easy, but it isnt
so I doubt that you will ever see this.
What exactly does the customer want to do that they cant today?
Cheers,
Phil
|
90.28 | Popup-menu Customization | ULYSSE::BAUDELLE | | Thu Nov 14 1996 02:12 | 18 |
| Alex,
In the consolemanager conference (1352.7) i made public some
undocumented Pcm features inherited from Phil Baxter.
These features allow the eventlist popup-menu customization and
is
really useful. Dan , in 1352.8, told me to ask you to document
and
support it in a future Pcm release.
If this is possible could you add the "date and time" as
parameter
(P5) to make the use of procedures started based on these
parameters even better.
Thanks
Pierre
|