[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference smurf::buildhelp

Title:USG buildhelp questions/answers
Moderator:SMURF::FILTER
Created:Mon Apr 26 1993
Last Modified:Mon Jan 20 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2763
Total number of notes:5802

2553.0. "I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0a" by AOSG::FILTER (Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck) Tue Sep 10 1996 14:50

Date Of Receipt: 	10-SEP-1996 13:29:49.55
From: 	FLUME::"[email protected]" "10-Sep-1996 1304"
To: 	[email protected]
CC: 	[email protected]
Subj: 	I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0a

I updated conf.h and the date of the new sccs is 1996/09/06
the newly built versions did not rebuild the few files that 
reference the literal MAXFIELD (which was changed in conf.h)
It's like the build rules weren't invoked ???

Please ack and tell me when you've corrected it.

thanks
Charlie Katz

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2553.1Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0aAOSG::FILTERAutomatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puckTue Sep 10 1996 14:5026
Date Of Receipt: 	10-SEP-1996 13:46:43.58
From: 	FLUME::"[email protected]" "10-Sep-1996 1344"
To: 	[email protected]
CC: 	[email protected], [email protected]
Subj: 	Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0a

Could you be a little more specific as to what pool/build we're talking about 
here?


| I updated conf.h and the date of the new sccs is 1996/09/06
| the newly built versions did not rebuild the few files that 
| reference the literal MAXFIELD (which was changed in conf.h)
| It's like the build rules weren't invoked ???
| 
| Please ack and tell me when you've corrected it.
| 
| thanks
| Charlie Katz

-- 

				-Grant



2553.2Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0aAOSG::FILTERAutomatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puckTue Sep 10 1996 15:5414
Date Of Receipt: 	10-SEP-1996 14:49:57.76
From: 	FLUME::jmcg "Jim McGinness"
To: 	[email protected]
CC: 	buildhelp@DEC:.zko.flume, odehelp@DEC:.zko.flume
Subj: 	Re:  I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0a

There's a problem in sandboxes in that the compiler will locate a .h
file in the same directory containing the .c file before it looks
for the .h file in other trees.  You may have to check one or all of the
files out (you can check them out unlocked) into your sandbox before
your sandbox build will match the nightly build.

Problems involving building should go to the "buildhelp" alias.

2553.3Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0aAOSG::FILTERAutomatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puckTue Sep 10 1996 16:5619
Date Of Receipt: 	10-SEP-1996 15:38:31.08
From: 	FLUME::"[email protected]" "10-Sep-1996 1513"
To: 	"Grant Van Dyck" <[email protected]>
CC: 	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subj: 	Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in  4.0/4.0a
The build pools involved are (as stated in the subject line): 	v40

and v40asupportos
---------------------
| I updated conf.h and the date of the new sccs is 1996/09/06
| the newly built versions did not rebuild the few files that 
| reference the literal MAXFIELD (which was changed in conf.h)
| It's like the build rules weren't invoked ???
| 
| Please ack and tell me when you've corrected it.
| 
| thanks
| Charlie Katz

2553.4Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0aAOSG::FILTERAutomatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puckTue Sep 10 1996 17:5834
Date Of Receipt: 	10-SEP-1996 15:57:51.38
From: 	HUNCH::"[email protected]" "10-Sep-1996 1555"
To: 	[email protected]
CC: 	[email protected], [email protected]
Subj: 	Re: I believe that sendmail is not building properly in 4.0/4.0a

OK sorry, I missed that.  How are you determining the failure? I've looked in 
v40supportos.nightly and v40asupportos.nightly and your submit is there. The 
obj gets nuked each time and rebuilt, so there's no way that it would 
selectively rebuild objects, or perhaps I still don't understand your question.


	-Grant


| The build pools involved are (as stated in the subject line): v40 
| and v40asupportos
| ---------------------
| | I updated conf.h and the date of the new sccs is 1996/09/06
| | the newly built versions did not rebuild the few files that 
| | reference the literal MAXFIELD (which was changed in conf.h)
| | It's like the build rules weren't invoked ???
| | 
| | Please ack and tell me when you've corrected it.
| | 
| | thanks
| | Charlie Katz

-- 

				-Grant