Conference smurf::buildhelp

1571.0. "decision, Re: new submit log mail format - feedback?" by AOSG::FILTER (Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck) Fri Jun 23 1995 20:00

Date Of Receipt: 	21-JUN-1995 18:00:48.38
From: 	SMURF::FLUME::jmf "Joshua M. Friedman OSF/UNIX SDE  21-Jun-1995 1759"
To: 	jproj@DEC:.zko.flume
CC: 	odehelp@DEC:.zko.flume, tresvik@DEC:.zko.flume
Subj: 	decision, Re: new submit log mail format - feedback?
For now, I'm going with the subject format like: 	
Subject: 	V32SUPPORTOS submits 06/20/95,16:53 116-spinney 117-spinney 118-tmark 120-kinstler

Here are my replies to your comments.  Thanks...

(Note this can change later if we like)

	-josh


> From: [email protected] (Mark Warren USG)
> 
> Why not shorten it still further to 
> 
>     Subject: V32SUPPORTOS submits 06/20/95 16:53 116 117 118 120
> 
> the same info is still there, and the srequests are still uniqely
> identified.

Mark, I thought it would be useful to have the names there, so
if you know you're expecting work from someone in particular you
can tell at a glance who's done the submits.


> From: [email protected]
> 
> Looks good Josh. Is there any chance that you can get the subject line
> to wrap at 80 characters? In most cases, since the mail goes out every
> 15 minutes, it won't be necessary but it is easier on the eyes if it is
> wrapped. Thanks,
> Joe

Joe, as far as a know, the subject line can't be wrapped or it ceases
to continue being the subject line.


> I agree with Kevin. Good idea - drop the <pool>.
> 
> > 	Josh I like your idea, and I think you
> > 	should cut out the <pool>- portion of each defect number.
> > 
> > 			Reguards
> > 			Kevin Harty
> 
> -Grant

Ok that sounds fine to me.