| Date Of Receipt: 14-MAR-1995 09:18:21.30
From: SMURF::WASTED::werme "Eric Werme USG 14-Mar-1995 0917"
To: "Joshua M. Friedman, OSF/UNIX SDE 381-1548" <jmf@DEC:.zko.wasted>
CC: odehelp@DEC:.zko.wasted
Subj: Re: DEC OSF/1 'cde' pools locked ('os' was temporarily out of order too)
We have experienced a full DECode-II RCS disk over the weekend (as a
result of an unusually large submission into ptcde which grew the rcs
pool more than was expected). This affected ALL 'os' and 'cde' pools.
Other 'x' pools were unaffected.
This disk now has about 10 MB of "breathing space" so 'os' developers
should be able to proceed with work.
Perhaps it's time to purge some of the old RCS revs or branches. Some
of those ,v files must be getting monstrous!
|
| Date Of Receipt: 14-MAR-1995 10:10:53.98
From: SMURF::FLUME::jmf "Joshua M. Friedman OSF/UNIX SDE"
To: werme@DEC:.zko.flume
CC: odehelp tresvik
Subj: Re: DEC OSF/1 'cde' pools locked ('os' was temporarily out of order too)
Ric, re:
> Perhaps it's time to purge some of the old RCS revs or branches. Some
> of those ,v files must be getting monstrous!
Thanks for the suggestion. I've looked into this and have purged some of
the branches on the bigger offending files (binary .a's for example), but
the only thing that can be purged are private branches people have
inadvertently left behind. We can't purge product branches or we lose
the ability to recreate the past. Also, with 50,000+ files in the pools,
nothing manually intensive could be done; it must be automateable.
It is worth looking into more, however; thanks...
-josh
From werme Tue Mar 14 09:17:02 1995
Delivery-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 95 09:17:11 -0500
Return-Path: werme
Received: from abelia.zk3.dec.com by flume.zk3.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/16Jan95-0946AM)
id AA30439; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 09:17:02 -0500
Received: from localhost by wasted.zk3.dec.com; (5.65 EXP 2/22/95 for V3.2/1.1.8.2/18Feb95-1123AM)
id AA07568; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 09:17:00 -0500
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: "Joshua M. Friedman, OSF/UNIX SDE 381-1548" <jmf>
Cc: odehelp
Subject: Re: DEC OSF/1 'cde' pools locked ('os' was temporarily out of order too)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 Mar 95 10:22:36 EST."
<[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 95 09:17:00 -0500
From: werme
X-Mts: smtp
We have experienced a full DECode-II RCS disk over the weekend (as a
result of an unusually large submission into ptcde which grew the rcs
pool more than was expected). This affected ALL 'os' and 'cde' pools.
Other 'x' pools were unaffected.
This disk now has about 10 MB of "breathing space" so 'os' developers
should be able to proceed with work.
Perhaps it's time to purge some of the old RCS revs or branches. Some
of those ,v files must be getting monstrous!
|