| Date Of Receipt: 13-FEB-1995 13:26:53.62
From: SMURF::ALPHA::"[email protected]" "13-Feb-1995 1325"
To: Dave Gerson USG <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Subj: Re: How do I accomplish the following:
Comments at the bottom ....
|
| I have the below 3 revisions of kernel/io/dec/ws/ati64.c checked into a
| sandbox, sb2, backed by ptos.nightly -
|
| revision 1.1.9.4
| date: 1995/02/09 22:32:47; author: Dave_Gerson; state: Exp; lines: +19 -1
| Add declarations for static functions.
| ----------------------------
| revision 1.1.9.3
| date: 1995/02/07 19:58:39; author: Dave_Gerson; state: Exp; lines: +16 -14
| Incorporate Don Haney's cursor bit filling algorithm in
| ati64_reformat_cursor(). Also his fix for pixel noise on
| top border related to rapid movement of cursor in
| ati64_set_cursor_position().
| ----------------------------
| revision 1.1.9.2
| date: 1995/02/07 16:18:14; author: Dave_Gerson; state: Exp; lines: +1 -4
| Remove hardcoded initialization values for Bus_cntl,
| Mem_cntl, color depth in ati64_bot(). Rely on values
| saved from BIOS/console during boot up.
| ----------------------------
| revision 1.1.9.1
| date: 1995/02/07 16:05:01; author: Dave_Gerson; state: Exp; lines: +2615 -
0
| *** Initial Branch Revision ***
|
| I have another sandbox, ptl1, backed by ptliteos. I want to use only version
| 1.1.9.2 of the file to make a submit to ptliteos from this 2nd sandbox. Can I
| bco -u -r1.1.9.2 ati64.c and then bsubmit it somehow?
|
Yes do that, in the 2nd sandbox, then move it aside and just bco the file.
Drop the saved copy on top - check the comments and submit. HOWEVER, this may
cause a merge conflicy for you in the 1st sandbox when you do submit as the
ancestor of it will be older that the submitted version, but as the content is
the same it should be trivial to resolve - if it happens at all.
-Grant
|