| Title: | USG buildhelp questions/answers |
| Moderator: | SMURF::FILTER |
| Created: | Mon Apr 26 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Jan 20 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2763 |
| Total number of notes: | 5802 |
Date Of Receipt: 28-JUN-1994 13:42:39.78
From: QUARRY::"[email protected]" "28-Jun-1994 1346"
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subj: Additional entry for /usr/sde/build_list
Hi.
An entry for v13bsupportx.nightly needs to be added to /usr/sde/build_list.
A couple of months ago, I had some problems and you added v12supportx.nightly
and v20supportx.nightly to build_list, but evidently not v13bsupportx.nightly
because we have now run into the same problem with it.
I've attached the original mail below FYI. Let me know if you have any
questions.
Thanks,
John F.
Return-Path: franzini
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
franzini
Subject: Problem resolving backing tree names
Date: Fri, 06 May 94 13:55:55 -0400
From: "John Franzini" <franzini>
X-Mts: smtp
Hello.
When I try to create a sandbox backed against any of the following trees:
v12supportx.nightly
v13bsupportx.nightly
v20supportx.nightly
when I don't have a default sandbox, I get the following error:
>> WARNING in mksb:
>> v12supportx.nightly is not a legal, accessible sandbox.
>> Will prompt for this information.
No known current builds to pick from.
Enter absolute path to backing tree or name from build list:
I suspect the problem is that /usr/sde/build_list does not contain entries
for the above trees. It does contain entries for v12supportos,
v12supportos.nightly, v12supportx, etc. and I can create sandboxes backed
against those trees.
The problem doesn't show up if I have a default sandbox. Evidently, mksb
reads the default sandbox's rc_files/shared file which in turn includes
../link/rc_files/shared and that defines:
build_base /usr/sde/osf1/build
Apparently, this overrides /usr/sde/build_list.
If my conjectures are correct, could you add the trees listed above to
/usr/sde/build_list?
Thank you,
John F.
Return-Path: vandyck
Received: by cardinal.zk3.dec.com; id AA12183; Fri, 6 May 1994 14:20:08 -0400
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: "John Franzini" <franzini>
Cc: odehelp, [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Problem resolving backing tree names
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 May 94 13:55:55 EDT."
<[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 May 94 14:20:08 -0400
From: Grant Van Dyck <vandyck>
X-Mts: smtp
| Hello.
|
| When I try to create a sandbox backed against any of the following trees:
|
| v12supportx.nightly
| v13bsupportx.nightly
| v20supportx.nightly
|
Evidently, mksb
| reads the default sandbox's rc_files/shared file which in turn includes
| ../link/rc_files/shared and that defines:
|
| build_base /usr/sde/osf1/build
|
| Apparently, this overrides /usr/sde/build_list.
|
| If my conjectures are correct, could you add the trees listed above to
| /usr/sde/build_list?
Yes, your conjectures are correct and those entries were missing. They're
in there now, although it may take a little while for your /usr/sde
server to be updated.
-Grant
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 821.1 | Re: Additional entry for /usr/sde/build_list | SMURF::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Tue Jun 28 1994 15:40 | 109 |
Date Of Receipt: 28-JUN-1994 14:09:58.43 From: FLUME::"[email protected]" "Grant Van Dyck 28-Jun-1994 1408" To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subj: Re: Additional entry for /usr/sde/build_list Done. It'll take a little while to propagate. -Grant | Hi. | | An entry for v13bsupportx.nightly needs to be added to /usr/sde/build_list. | A couple of months ago, I had some problems and you added v12supportx.nightly | and v20supportx.nightly to build_list, but evidently not v13bsupportx.nightly | because we have now run into the same problem with it. | | I've attached the original mail below FYI. Let me know if you have any | questions. | | Thanks, | John F. | | | Return-Path: franzini | To: [email protected] | Cc: [email protected], [email protected], | franzini | Subject: Problem resolving backing tree names | Date: Fri, 06 May 94 13:55:55 -0400 | From: "John Franzini" <franzini> | X-Mts: smtp | | Hello. | | When I try to create a sandbox backed against any of the following trees: | | v12supportx.nightly | v13bsupportx.nightly | v20supportx.nightly | | when I don't have a default sandbox, I get the following error: | | >> WARNING in mksb: | >> v12supportx.nightly is not a legal, accessible sandbox. | >> Will prompt for this information. | No known current builds to pick from. | Enter absolute path to backing tree or name from build list: | | I suspect the problem is that /usr/sde/build_list does not contain entries | for the above trees. It does contain entries for v12supportos, | v12supportos.nightly, v12supportx, etc. and I can create sandboxes backed | against those trees. | | The problem doesn't show up if I have a default sandbox. Evidently, mksb | reads the default sandbox's rc_files/shared file which in turn includes | ../link/rc_files/shared and that defines: | | build_base /usr/sde/osf1/build | | Apparently, this overrides /usr/sde/build_list. | | If my conjectures are correct, could you add the trees listed above to | /usr/sde/build_list? | | Thank you, | John F. | | Return-Path: vandyck | Received: by cardinal.zk3.dec.com; id AA12183; Fri, 6 May 1994 14:20:08 -0400 | Message-Id: <[email protected]> | To: "John Franzini" <franzini> | Cc: odehelp, [email protected], | [email protected] | Subject: Re: Problem resolving backing tree names | In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 May 94 13:55:55 EDT." | <[email protected]> | Date: Fri, 06 May 94 14:20:08 -0400 | From: Grant Van Dyck <vandyck> | X-Mts: smtp | | | | Hello. | | | | When I try to create a sandbox backed against any of the following trees: | | | | v12supportx.nightly | | v13bsupportx.nightly | | v20supportx.nightly | | | Evidently, mksb | | reads the default sandbox's rc_files/shared file which in turn includes | | ../link/rc_files/shared and that defines: | | | | build_base /usr/sde/osf1/build | | | | Apparently, this overrides /usr/sde/build_list. | | | | If my conjectures are correct, could you add the trees listed above to | | /usr/sde/build_list? | | | Yes, your conjectures are correct and those entries were missing. They're | in there now, although it may take a little while for your /usr/sde | server to be updated. | | -Grant | |||||