| Date Of Receipt: 18-JAN-1994 20:51:16.84
From: US2RMC::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon"
To: [email protected] (Panning for Gold...)
CC: [email protected]
Subj: Re: did odemount change. I get the usage message when I do an odemount goldos. thanks paula
Well, yes it did change, but not so that you should notice. What flags were
you using and what output did you get?
I just tried it and it worked fine, no usage message.
Josh added a -bg (background) switch - mostly for admin's usage on the
production machines, so if a requested tree is unavailable, it doesn't bail
out anymore, but backgrounds it and goes on to the rest.
This was affecting production machines that do odemount -all and weren't
getting "all" sometimes. If you call odemount with -all, this behavior is
now the default.
--
-Grant
% Received: by us2rmc.bb.dec.com; id AA21054; Tue, 18 Jan 94 20:48:53 -0500
by cardinal.zk3.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/01Nov93-1038AM) id AA02587; Tue, 18 Jan 1994 20:51:33 -050
% From: Grant Van Dyck <[email protected]>
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Subject: Re: did odemount change. I get the usage message when I do an odemount goldos. thanks paula
% To: [email protected] (Panning for Gold...)
% Date: Tue, 18 Jan 1994 20:51:32 -0500 (EST)
% Cc: [email protected]
% In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Panning for Gold..." at Jan 18, 94 06:13:02 pm
% Reply-To: [email protected]
% X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20]
% Content-Type: text
% Content-Length: 557
|