| Title: | USG buildhelp questions/answers |
| Moderator: | SMURF::FILTER |
| Created: | Mon Apr 26 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Jan 20 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2763 |
| Total number of notes: | 5802 |
Date Of Receipt: 23-NOV-1993 09:57:15.66 From: ALPHA::"[email protected]" "23-Nov-1993 0957" To: [email protected] CC: Subj: ODEV2.1 and Sterling PRE-BL8 Hi, Has it been confirmed that ODEV2.1 will not run on workstations running Sterling PRE-BL8? Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------- Rich Larsen, M/S: UNX TCP/IP: [email protected] USSG/User Env. & Std. Group DECnet: UNXA::LARSEN Digital Equipment Corporation FAX: 908-577-6003 200 Route 9 North Voice: 908-577-6083 Manalapan, New Jersey 07726 DTN: 462
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 449.1 | Re: ODEV2.1 and Sterling PRE-BL8 | SMURF::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:07 | 13 |
Date Of Receipt: 23-NOV-1993 17:42:45.81 From: WASTED::jmf "Joshua M. Friedman ULTRIX SDE 23-Nov-1993 1742" To: "Rich Larsen (908) 577-6083 DTN 462-6083 [email protected]" <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] Subj: Re: ODEV2.1 and Sterling PRE-BL8 rich, it seems that ode v2.1 may be ok from what Jim Woodward sent - the ode v2.0 + sup-patches seems to have problems, though. I've heard the problem are only in pre-bl8 and will not be in bl8. -josh | |||||
| 449.2 | sterling pre-bl8 | SMURF::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Fri Dec 03 1993 13:38 | 48 |
Date Of Receipt: 3-DEC-1993 13:18:08.63 From: ABYSS::rust::ode To: unx::rll, unx::mik CC: abyss::odehelp Subj: sterling pre-bl8 hi rich, the problem is that ode 2.0 images were linked with shared libraries and ode 2.1 were linked without shared libraries. the way to tell if an image is linked for use with shared libraries or not, do "odump -hv" on the file. if you see a section header called .dynamic, the image was linked for shared libraries. otherwise it's not. so the solution for pre-bl8 is to use ode 2.1 tools. jo ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: [email protected] Received: by fungus.zso.dec.com (5.57/DECwest-CLUSTRIX-cjf-30Jun93) id AA02387; Tue, 23 Nov 93 14:42:52 -0800 Received: by wasted.zk3.dec.com; id AA09445; Tue, 23 Nov 1993 17:42:29 -0500 Received: by longbow.zk3.dec.com; id AA04919; Tue, 23 Nov 1993 17:42:29 -0500 Message-Id: <[email protected]> To: "Rich Larsen (908) 577-6083 DTN 462-6083 [email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: ODEV2.1 and Sterling PRE-BL8 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 23 Nov 93 09:57:21 EST." <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 93 17:42:29 -0500 From: "Joshua Friedman, OSF/UNIX SDE 381-1548" <[email protected]> X-Mts: smtp rich, it seems that ode v2.1 may be ok from what Jim Woodward sent - the ode v2.0 + sup-patches seems to have problems, though. I've heard the problem are only in pre-bl8 and will not be in bl8. - -josh ------- End of Forwarded Message | |||||