[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
| Title: | USG buildhelp questions/answers |
|
| Moderator: | SMURF::FILTER |
|
| Created: | Mon Apr 26 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Jan 20 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2763 |
| Total number of notes: | 5802 |
419.0. "Re: osf tree build question" by SMURF::FILTER (Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck) Thu Nov 04 1993 18:57
Date Of Receipt: 4-NOV-1993 18:26:25.57
From: FLUME::jmcg "Jim McGinness"
To: flume::buildhelp, [email protected]
CC:
Subj: Re: osf tree build question
I'm not sure where your notion of "traditional" comes from, there are
so many different heritages....
I think the answer to your question is to use "mklinks ../obj/alpha/kernel"
to avoid rebuilding the BINARY .o files. The kernel Makefile produced
by config will not go into the backing tree looking for object files.
Once your sandbox is established, you might want to stick to the
build actions of:
BINARY_config
BINARY_depend
and BINARY_vmunix
(or add whatever you wish in place of BINARY).
-- jmcg
| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines
|
|---|