[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | USG buildhelp questions/answers |
|
Moderator: | SMURF::FILTER |
|
Created: | Mon Apr 26 1993 |
Last Modified: | Mon Jan 20 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2763 |
Total number of notes: | 5802 |
413.0. "FWD: osf tree build ?" by SMURF::FILTER (Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck) Thu Nov 04 1993 11:20
Date Of Receipt: 4-NOV-1993 11:01:02.13
From: ABYSS::decwet::anderson
RUST::decwet::jones 3-NOV-1993 17:20:47.43
To: abyss::buildhelp
ode
CC: abyss::jones, abyss::ode, abyss::stoppani
stoppani, jones
Subj: FWD: osf tree build ?
osf tree build ?
The traditional kernel build involves 2 phases:
1) config & depend that create a Makefile in your "systemname" directory
2) make all to build *.o files and link vmunix
What I understand of the "build /src/kernel/setup" command is that
it accomplishes phase 1 above. However, after running "build setup"
it seems that *all* *.o files are regarded as out of date and re-compiled
by "build BINARY". Once the dependencies are established in the Makefile,
make *should* be able to determine which *.o files need to be rebuilt
and only re-compile those *.o's. This was the case under the original
UNIX kernel build environment. My questions are:
What is the latest fokelore on the expected behavior of "build setup"?
Can a config/depend that doesn't outdate *.o be accomplished?
Who created the OSF build environment, and what were their intentions
regarding the behavior of "build setup"?
Thanks,
Alan
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|