| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 30.1 | mounting | SMURF::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Thu Aug 25 1994 09:57 | 31 |
| Date Of Receipt: 24-AUG-1994 17:43:38.77
From: WASTED::"[email protected]" "24-Aug-1994 1736"
To: [email protected]
CC:
Subj: mounting
Hello
I am having a problem getting a sandbox backed to v13supportx. I am
on bluhil and a segment of 'odemount -list' shows ...
Mounted v13supportx: silver x11 maint support submits (DEC1.3 patch)
Unmounted v13supportx: agxmaint.bl6 (backing v13supportx)
When I try to 'masb -back v13supportx ...' I get the following error
bluhil:> mksb -back v13supportx -dir /work/sb/sja v13support
>> WARNING in mksb:
>> could not get project directory or default build.
>> WARNING in mksb:
>> v13supportx is not a legal, accessible sandbox.
>> Will prompt for this information.
No known current builds to pick from.
Enter absolute path to backing tree or name from build list:
I assume this is caused by the confusion over which v13supportx to use.
How do I specify the mounted version, or get rid of the unmounted build
Thanks
Steve Albrecht
Motif Quality Group
|
| 30.2 | Re: mounting | SMURF::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Thu Aug 25 1994 09:58 | 10 |
| Date Of Receipt: 24-AUG-1994 17:47:25.79
From: FLAMBE::johnf "John Flanagan USG Test Johnf Tools Group 24-Aug-1994 1745"
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subj: Re: mounting
It appears that the backingtree which backs v13supportx agxmaint.bl6]
is not mounted. I believe if you do another "odemount v13supportx" and
then try the mksb you'll be all set.
|
| 30.3 | ? | AOSG::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Wed Jan 18 1995 10:49 | 18 |
| Date Of Receipt: 18-JAN-1995 10:36:15.57
From: SMURF::FLAMBE::"[email protected]"
To: flambe::odehelp
CC: ode@DEC:.zko.flambe
Subj: ?
Hi,
Do you know if Locus is still doing
development using ode for Digital?
And if so, about how many engineers
are doing development, and in what manner,
i.e. do they just do builds, or do bco, bci, ...
thanks,
tina
|
| 30.4 | Re: ? | AOSG::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Wed Jan 18 1995 10:50 | 16 |
| Date Of Receipt: 18-JAN-1995 10:39:28.04
From: SMURF::FLAMBE::barrys "Barry Sullivan USG 18-Jan-1995 1038"
To: decwet::anderson (Tina Anderson)
CC: barrys@DEC:.zko.flambe, odehelp@DEC:.zko.flambe
Subj: Re: ?
Hi Tina;
Do not know how many engineers they have that are using
ode. However they do sup certain pools & nightlys and have bco and
bci capability. Primarly they are doing the out the box
application maintenance.
Regards,
Barry
|
| 30.5 | ? | AOSG::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Wed Mar 29 1995 12:30 | 20 |
| Date Of Receipt: 29-MAR-1995 10:42:28.42
From: SMURF::FLUME::daniele "Mike Daniele 29-Mar-1995 1041"
To: odeadmin@DEC:.zko.flume
CC:
Subj: ?
This worked fine about 30 minutes ago, now when I
try to build in a sandbox backed against v32supportos.nightly
I get
bernie> build
relative path: ./usr/sbin/esnmpd.
make: illegal option -- c
usage: make [-eiknqrst] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-f makefile ]
[-I directory] [-j max_jobs] [variable=value]
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Mike
|
| 30.6 | Re: ? | AOSG::FILTER | Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck | Wed Mar 29 1995 12:34 | 32 |
| Date Of Receipt: 29-MAR-1995 11:08:20.10
From: SMURF::ALPHA::"[email protected]" "29-Mar-1995 1107"
To: Mike Daniele <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Subj: Re: ?
You're picking up the wrong make. Make sure the backing tree is mounted and
you can see
v32supportos.nightly/tools/alpha_OSF1/alpha/hostbin/make
from your sandbox. If so, make sure that `sbinfo PATH` has this location in
it.
-Grant
| This worked fine about 30 minutes ago, now when I
| try to build in a sandbox backed against v32supportos.nightly
| I get
|
| bernie> build
| relative path: ./usr/sbin/esnmpd.
| make: illegal option -- c
| usage: make [-eiknqrst] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-f makefile ]
| [-I directory] [-j max_jobs] [variable=value]
|
| Any ideas?
| Thanks,
| Mike
|
|