[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DOCUMENT T1.0 |
Notice: | **New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)** |
Moderator: | CLOSET::ADLER |
|
Created: | Mon Feb 09 1987 |
Last Modified: | Thu Oct 31 1991 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 897 |
Total number of notes: | 4397 |
786.0. "<NESTED_TABLE_BREAK> gives extraneous ruled line" by AUTHOR::WELLCOME (Steve) Mon Aug 10 1987 17:40
V1 puts an extraneous ruled line at the first occurrence
of a <NESTED_TABLE_BREAK> tag in a nested table. The construction
that causes the extraneous line, though valid, used to generate
an extraneous error message in BL7 in addition to putting in the
extraneous line. I think there was a note about it, but I can't
find it. In any case, in V1 there is no longer an error message
(which is correct), but the output is still wrong.
I have a test table to reproduce the problem that I can send to
anybody who is interested. Basically, though, it's set up something
like this:
<TABLE>
...setup 2-col table...
<TABLE_ROW>(Column 1 stuff\
<TABLE>
...setup 2-col table...
<TABLE_ROW>(...)
<NESTED_TABLE_BREAK> <---a ruled line appears here in output
<TABLE_ROW>(...)
<NESTED_TABLE_BREAK>
<TABLE_ROW>(...)
<NESTED_TABLE_BREAK>
<TABLE_ROW>(...)
<ENDTABLE>)
<ENDTABLE>
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
786.1 | It is so documented | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue Aug 11 1987 14:48 | 8 |
|
<NESTED_TABLE_BREAK> admittedly doesn't provide the optimal method
for formatting broken up tables. The extra rule following the
first tag is still there; there is no message, but the behavior
is documented in the User's Guide, Part 1. We will be looking for
some better behavior ...
|
786.2 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Aug 11 1987 14:51 | 1 |
| Yuck.
|