Title: | DOCUMENT T1.0 |
Notice: | **New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)** |
Moderator: | CLOSET::ADLER |
Created: | Mon Feb 09 1987 |
Last Modified: | Thu Oct 31 1991 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 897 |
Total number of notes: | 4397 |
I have a question about how indexes are formatted. No, this is not a report of problems creating an index... it processed and printed beautifully! (phew) Here's a part of an index I created yesterday (BL8, soft.spec, postscript): bottom of one pg top of next page vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv || vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv . Shift key (EVEplus) (cont'd.) . See PF1 key . ------------------------- ------------------------- P T ------------------------- ------------------------- PF1 key (EVEplus) . 4-2 Text editor... Programming editing support . 1-3 . . ------------------------- . S ------------------------- Shift key (EVEplus) It seems to me that the index entry "Shift key" was treated in kind of an odd fashion. I would prefer to have the S heading shifted to the next column (and in this case, the next page). I've had primary entries split across columns in this way more than once. Sometimes the columns happen to be on different pages, sometimes they are on the same page. Is this the expected behaviour? Is there some way I can use <final_cleanup> or some such to force these entries to not be split this way?
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
705.1 | needs some work | CLOSET::ANKLAM | Mon Aug 10 1987 17:06 | 14 | |
We haven't seen that behavior too frequently, but it appears we'll need to do one of the following (as per your request): 1. Fix the DESIGN files so that the breaks are handled better. 2. Provide a way to do final clean-up on an index output (and presumably TOC) file. Meanwhile, if you do want to do hand clean-up on the index file, I can tell you offline how to do it for now. (It's ugly, and I want to keep this NOTES file clean. -pa | |||||
705.2 | Security Blanket | DECWET::KOSAK | Tue Aug 11 1987 11:32 | 13 | |
Re: .1 Would it be possible to do both solutions 1. and 2.? Smarter design files are always preferred, but chances are they may not always catch every strange break, or meet every user's needs. Perhaps I'm just wanting a security blanket, but from a production standpoint, I'd feel much more comfortable if there was a way to get into these files and do some final cleanup. Thanks for your responsiveness Patti, as always. -- Craig | |||||
705.3 | DECWET::HUNT | Liz Hunt | Tue Aug 11 1987 21:31 | 8 | |
Thanks for the reply, Patti. The document for which the index was formatted strangely was an informal document, so I'm going to leave the index just as it is. If I run across this problem again, though, in a more official document, I'll take you up on your offer of assistance with hand cleanup. |