T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
698.1 | "Use the fix described in A.read_me_first" | CLOSET::OTTE | | Wed Jul 22 1987 16:14 | 14 |
| This problem is decribed in the release notes (they are the file
DOC010.RELEASE_NOTES in the documenation copy area).
Sorry if my earlier note seemed inaccurate:the problem is that the
font dictionary in the LPS40 is running out of room, whether this
is DOCUMENT's problem for trying to shove too much in, or the LPS40's
for not having enough of that sort of memory is a discussion I'll
leave to someone with a more philosophical bent than I.
In any case, if you print the the User manuals using the broken
up versions as described in the file A.read_me_first, you should
have no problems,
-randy
|
698.2 | Not quite working yet | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Wed Jul 22 1987 16:55 | 16 |
| Splitting vol 1 into two pieces is great as far as you went, but
the second piece is not yet small enough. Can you resplit it more
equally, or in three pieces?
Are we always going to have this sort of problem with large
documents??? We are going to have a lot of large documents,
and hopefully we won't have to split them up.
I have not printed the second half of vol 2 yet, but it is smaller,
so it should work.
Did you guys actually try printing this stuff before you announced
it? 8-)
Ken Serack
DECwest Engineering
|
698.3 | Vol 2 is broken also | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Wed Jul 22 1987 18:06 | 7 |
| Vol 2 doesn't print either! However, it produces a different error.
LPS-W-UNDEF, undefined: Name not known - offending command
is turySchlbk-Bold-DOCPSE
Can you please fix both vol 1 and 2.
Ken
|
698.4 | | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Wed Jul 22 1987 18:07 | 4 |
| A follow up note to .2 and .3 I AM using the split up version of
both Vol 1 and Vol 2.
Ken
|
698.5 | more info on where the Vol 1, second file died? | CLOSET::OTTE | | Wed Jul 22 1987 18:37 | 15 |
| We *did* test print everything before we copied it into that area---it
all printed fine on our LPS40. Where (approx page-number) did your
print job of the User Manual volume 1, second file die? This info
can tell me where to place the next split.
The different error you got from printing the second half of the
user manual volume 2 does not effect your printing of that file---you
should have gotten all of that book. What happened was that because
we use so darn many fonts, we underestimated how long our comment
line would be at the end of the .POST file--the error message you
got was caused by a comment about the fonts overflowing the comment
area and getting into the output stream. Sorry about that, but
it *is* safe to ignore it.
-randy
|
698.6 | 698.3 | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Wed Jul 22 1987 19:33 | 8 |
| Vol 1 printed all pages up to and including D-14.
Vol 2 printed all pages up to and including Index-6.
Thanks
Ken
Don't take my complaining TOO seriously. Didn't you see the Smiley
Face? 8-)
|
698.7 | Just curious | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Wed Jul 22 1987 19:40 | 5 |
| I am really curious how you printed the complete file on your LPS40.
Or did you print all of the elements separatly? Why does putting
it in a public directory make it not print?
Ken
|
698.8 | Yet another file to be copied in... | CLOSET::OTTE | | Thu Jul 23 1987 11:20 | 15 |
| Thanks for the page info Ken, looks like you got all that was there.
(unfortunately the User manual vol 1 didn't include an index in
that file...I'll be putting its index in the copy area on VAXUUM
and on NEWDOC shortly).
I never did get a complete printing of the entire .POST file on
our LPS40, but I posted the file just the same in case it was only a local
problem.
I did see you smiley face Ken, it was just that at that point I
was having particularly unpleasant thoughts about .POST files...
again, thanks for the info,
-Randy
|
698.9 | thanks for the fix | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Thu Jul 23 1987 17:01 | 8 |
| Thanks for the quick response to this problem. Apparently vol 2
printed completely. I got an error message and assumed that the
last pages of the file were lost. The index does indeed end with
V. Vol 1 did not have an index so I though it was missing. Everything
is ok now.
Thanks
Ken
|
698.10 | See Note 1.22 (I think that's the reply number) | VAXUUM::OTTE | | Thu Jul 23 1987 17:08 | 8 |
| The index you mention is part of the User Manual Vol 1 .LN03 file
but is absent in the .POST file. Its there now (both on VAXUUM::
and on NEWDOC::) as V1_USER_MAN_VOL_1_INDEX.POST.
By the way, any general questions about the docset or kit should
be done as replies to note 1 where everything gets announced.
-randy
|
698.11 | Increasing the dictionary size allows UG to Print on LPS40 | REGENT::MURPHY | | Thu Jul 23 1987 17:30 | 8 |
| I got both volumes of the User's Manual to print without dividing them up.
I did it by editing the PostScript file. For each manual, the first line
of the PostScript file that doesn't begin with a comment character (%)
includes the command "200 dict def". As the error message had indicated
that there wasn't enough room in the dictionary, I changed the 200
to 500. Then manual then printed with no problem.
Kathy
|
698.12 | It isn't the LPS40's fault | VIDEO::BATCHELDERN | Ned Batchelder, TBU P*stScript | Fri Jul 24 1987 09:59 | 11 |
| Re: .1: Please don't malign the LPS40, when in fact the problem is with
the PostScript output. As Kathy points out in .-1, the dictionary that
is full is not some built-in LPS40 dictionary, but your own dictionary.
Simply increasing its size as Kathy did will make life easier for your
customers, although it won't truly fix the problem, since it can still
overflow. The real fix will be to track how many fonts you have defined
and cut them back when you reach a certain limit.
(BTW, another fix that will slow the filling of your dictionary
would be to modify the definitions of DNF and DF in your prolog
to add only one name to the dictionary, rather than two.)
|
698.13 | Anyone have a crow available for eating? | VAXUUM::OTTE | | Fri Jul 24 1987 11:28 | 8 |
| I apologize if I cast aspersions on the LPS40. Re .11 and .12,
you are quite correct, the printing failure is a fault in the
PostScript file DOCUMENT creates, not in the LPS40 that processes
it--I was unfamiliar with the error message and misread its meaning.
Thanks for the suggested fixes,
-Randy
|
698.14 | debit where debit is due | VAXUUM::DEVRIES | M.D. -- your Device Doctor | Mon Jul 27 1987 20:26 | 7 |
| > I apologize if I cast aspersions on the LPS40.
Yes, aspersions, if cast, must be cast on the VAX DOCUMENT PostScript
converter developer, the VDPSCD. :-)
--Mark DeVries,
VDPSCD
|
698.15 | FYI - LPS40 error | 3D::BOYACK | pithy...pithy...pithy | Wed Jul 29 1987 09:39 | 14 |
|
I changed "dict def" to 600 and 500, respectively for User's Manual
Vol 1 and Vol 2, and both appear to have printed OK. However, both
terminated with an error status. I didn't capture the error message
for Vol 2, but the Vol 1 error message follows:
%LPS-W-UNDEF, undefined: Name not known - offending command is ammi10
%LPS-E-FLUSHING, Rest of Job (to EOJ) will be ignored
%LPS-I-JOBFINISH, Job 1719 Finish
This is just for "somebody's" information; again, the books appear
to be complete.
Joe
|
698.16 | the offending command is - "oops" | VAXUUM::DEVRIES | M.D. -- your Device Doctor | Wed Jul 29 1987 10:08 | 16 |
| Reply .5 and others make some reference to this problem, in which
the whole book prints and then you get an "undefined" message with
all or part of a font name listed as the offender.
Here is the explanation: Near the end of the .POST file is a comment
(%%DocumentFonts) which lists the fonts used. The list was so long that
the device converter split it in two, which made the PostScript
interpreter think the continuation was a bogus instruction.
The document prints okay, but the error message is disconcerting.
We will change these files for the benefit of those who copy them
in the future, and we apologize for the inconvenience and uncertainty
this has caused many of you to date. (And, of course, we'll fix
the device converter in the next go-round, too.)
--Mark
|
698.17 | files on VAXUUM/CLOSET fixed | CLOSET::OTTE | | Wed Jul 29 1987 10:29 | 6 |
| The two user manual files V1_USER_MANUAL_VOL_1.POST and
V1_USER_MANUAL_VOL_2.POST in VAXUUM::[sdml.v10] have been fixed and
should print without error. We'll be copying them over to
NEWDOC::[SDML.V10] shortly...
-randy
|