[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vaxuum::document_ft

Title:DOCUMENT T1.0
Notice:**New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)**
Moderator:CLOSET::ADLER
Created:Mon Feb 09 1987
Last Modified:Thu Oct 31 1991
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:897
Total number of notes:4397

674.0. "REVISION template is too demanding" by CASEE::CLARK (Ward Clark) Wed Jul 15 1987 18:56

    Expanding a REVISION token in LSE yields the following:

	<REVISION>[update-info]
	{revision-tags}...

    The second line set me off to the User Manual.  It turns out that the
    required placeholder is indeed very optional.  The line can be deleted
    without problem.

    Does the appearance of <REVISION> require that a <MARK> or
    <UPDATE_RANGE> block appear later in the document?

    -- Ward
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
674.1NoIJSAPL::KLERKTheo de KlerkWed Jul 15 1987 19:314
 <revision> does not need the presence of a <mark> block. The reverse
 however does need the <revision>

Theo