T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
646.1 | Label those [tbs]s | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Mon Jul 13 1987 10:59 | 7 |
|
put a <p> before each [tbs] and the spacing will be correct. DOCUMENT
would really like everyone to label every text element (even if
it's a [tbs]) and to have at least one text element between <headn>
tags.
|
646.2 | add the <p> to the LSE templates | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Jul 13 1987 12:29 | 13 |
| This suggests that the LSE templates for <HEADx> should automatically
include the <p>. This is a case where user convenience should override
the purist view. The purist view is that the LSE token, in this case
HEADx, should only expand to text that corresponds to the <headx> tag
and its parameter. This view is ok for traditional programming
languages, which have a rigid, (mostly) context-free grammar, but
should be relaxed for VAX DOCUMENT, which has lots of context-sensitive
requirements.
There may be a fair number of other LSE templates that would benefit
from including an automatic <p>.
Gary
|
646.3 | Not always a paragraph | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little, New York Area SWS, 323-4475 | Mon Jul 13 1987 13:26 | 8 |
| One minor problem that has been discussed before is that a paragraph
doesn't HAVE to follow a <HEADx>. There could be some other text
element like a figure or example that would be equally acceptable.
Maybe with LSE idea of leading and trailing stuff one could have
a <P> generated as long as another tag wasn't entered. Should be
an interesting placeholder definition to say the least.
-tl
|
646.4 | Make the <p> optional? | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Mon Jul 13 1987 15:29 | 7 |
| Would it be possible to expand <head> tags into something like this:
<head1>({text}\[symbol-name])
[<p>]
Rose
|
646.5 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Jul 13 1987 16:04 | 20 |
| Actually, I think it would be better to expand <headX> into something
like
<headX>({text}\[symbol-name])
<p>[new-paragraph]
with the leading punctuation for new-paragraph defined to be <p>. The
disadvantage is that it forces the paragraph text to be on the same
line as the <p>; unfortunately, LSE won't look for leading punctuation
on the previous line (at least it didn't the last time I checked).
Alternatively, you might want
<headX>({text}\[symbol-name])
[new-paragraph]
with new-paragraph expanding into the appropriate <p> and {text}.
Gary
|
646.6 | <p>( ... ) is an error. | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Mon Jul 13 1987 16:39 | 7 |
| <p> tags ought to always have either a space or a end-of-line
following them. YOu may decide to put the paragraph in parentheses
and if you write <p>(By the way, ...) you get a GTMAXARGS error
message from tag translation. Forming the habit of putting
<p> tags on lines by themselves (or following them with a space)
avoids the problem. bill
|
646.7 | Star light, star bright... | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little, New York Area SWS, 323-4475 | Mon Jul 13 1987 18:44 | 4 |
| I like the suggestion offered in .5 as modified by .6. Any chance
this being done for T1.1?
-tl
|