| Title: | DOCUMENT T1.0 |
| Notice: | **New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)** |
| Moderator: | CLOSET::ADLER |
| Created: | Mon Feb 09 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Oct 31 1991 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 897 |
| Total number of notes: | 4397 |
BUG: <COMMAND_SECTION>(running_head) doesn't work. Also, the
documentation states that, by default, the current chapter title is
the running head; this also doesn't work.
USING: doctype: layered
devices: mail/ln03
template: Command Template
I can't get the <COMMAND_SECTION> running heads to work correctly.
The documented default doesn't work (the chapter title being used as
the running head), and specifying a running head as an argument
doesn't work (nothing is output as the top running head; commands or
subcommands still produce the second running head).
SUGGESTION: If you are going to use the chapter title as the default,
you may want to consider giving us the option of specifying that we
don't want any running head at all. Some doctypes have the chapter
title at the bottom of the page and it would be ridiculous to repeat
the title in two places on the same page.
This error should be reproducible using any input. Drop me a line if
you can't reproduce it.
--Gerry
[I tried to find out if these bugs and suggestions have been reported,
but I may have missed previous notes. This file is so huge!]
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 538.1 | DSSDEV::FISHER | Work that dream and love your life. | Mon Jun 22 1987 12:05 | 17 | |
I reread the documentation. It correctly states, in the <SET_TEMPLATE_COMMAND> argument description of DOUBLERUNNINGHEADS, that, if the doctype does not call for running top titles, then the default is that there will be no top running head. The documentation implies that the doctype design can ignore the <COMMAND_SECTION> running-title argument, but it never says so directly. If this is true, how come LAYERED allows me double running heads when I use the <SUBCOMMAND_SECTION> tag with the running-title argument (the second header is the individual subcommand title)? Why won't this doctype allow me a <COMMAND_SECTION> running head along with the individual <COMMAND> name as the second running head? --Gerry | |||||