Title: | DOCUMENT T1.0 |
Notice: | **New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)** |
Moderator: | CLOSET::ADLER |
Created: | Mon Feb 09 1987 |
Last Modified: | Thu Oct 31 1991 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 897 |
Total number of notes: | 4397 |
The BL6 --> BL8 converter changes statements like <include>(filename.ldf) to <include>(filename.sdml). I am converting documents that I haven't looked at since December '86, and this is confusing; my first impression is that I must have had a .GNC file there, when in fact it's a defs file that is no longer required. I think the converter should either delete the <include>(xxx.ldf/.gdf) syntax or leave the file type alone. Of course, if the converter is going by the wayside for V1.0, this might be a moot issue at this point. Rose
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
518.1 | I reported something similar | TLE::SAVAGE | Neil, @Spit Brook | Wed Jun 17 1987 15:41 | 8 |
A similiar thing happened to one of the writers in our group. She had an <include>(somethingorother.gdx) tag that was changed to .sdml. She had to manually reedit to change the file type back because the file contained essential data for her template. This should be looked into. The majority of our writers have NOT begun to convert their files, so we'll need DOC$CONVERT for several months yet. | |||||
518.2 | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay low, keep moving | Wed Jun 17 1987 16:41 | 13 | |
Really doesn't make much difference anyhow. If you use the <include> to bring in a global definitions file, the processor blows up on that file. The book says that you should use the /symbols=filename.sdml switch on your command line to bring in globals; I haven't gotten that to work yet, either. Our system just ignores the "/symbols=" Until it gets straightened out, I'm putting my defines at the top of the first file that uses them; when I run the profile, or a makebook, these defines get read into the .xref file. Sometimes this creates an error that says that "aardvark has been defined twice and that I'm your last definition", or words to that effect. But it gets the job done... | |||||
518.3 | /SYMBOLS gets ignored? | CLOSET::KOHLBRENNER | Thu Jun 18 1987 09:56 | 7 | |
I'd sure like to know about a system that ignores the /SYMBOLS qualifier! Can you supply some more detail? WHat baselevel? What error messages? etc. bill | |||||
518.4 | CLOSUS::TAVARES | John--Stay low, keep moving | Thu Jun 18 1987 11:16 | 24 | |
I was running a book that was converted from bl6. Of course, I found out quickly that all that gdf and ldf stuff didn't work anymore. So I checked in the manual and found the /symbols qualifier. I renamed the gdf file .sdml, and put the /symbols qualifier on the command line. When I processed the document, it said that the book names I defined in the globals file (yes, I did change the defines to define_book_name) were undefined. I followed the manual to the letter. Then I switched the \profile= and \symbols= qualifiers on the command line, putting \symbols first, thinking that maybe there was some reason why it wasnt picking up the second qualifier. Again it ignored the /symbols and picked up the \profile. When we had .gdf files, we put a standard bit of stuff at the top about including the .gdf file only once. This was to keep the processor from picking the same stuff up when we do a bookbuild. In the converted file, I both left that stuff in, and took it out, no difference. This is, I think, because the processor is not going to that file at all. Hope this is enough info.... I know that we are running bl8, but that's about all I know about it. | |||||
518.5 | false alarm on /SYMBOLS qualifier | CLOSET::KOHLBRENNER | Thu Jun 18 1987 18:34 | 13 | |
re: .2 and .4 (/SYMBOLS qualifier not working) For those who are holding their breath to see under what conditions the /SYMBOLS qualifier did not work: Surprise! It works... ( A COM file supplied by someone else was dropping the /SYMBOLS qualifier -- hence it did not get a chance to work. - whew!) bill |