T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
514.1 | Some suggestions | DECWET::KOSAK | | Mon Jun 15 1987 18:30 | 20 |
| The only way I can think of turning your ASCII diagrams into sixel
format is to use CAPTURE, or the "print portion of sceen" VAXstation
menu option (but be warned, they will print at a much lower resolution
than you are used to, about 75 DPI I think). I believe there is
another note about CAPTURE somewhere in this conference.
I, for one, would like nothing more than to see PICMODE die the
speedy death it deserves. If you have access to a VAXsation II
you can run GRED or SIGHT (for working with DOCUMENT I would recommend
GRED, but both work well) and create superior looking graphics. SIGHT
will work on a PRO as well. For more information on these tools see
the conferences: VAXUUM::DOC_GRAPHICS (for GRED), or SARAH::SIGHT.
If they leave you confused send me mail at DECWET::KOSAK and I might
be able to point you in the right direction. I've also got some GRED
aids you might be interested in.
-- Craig
|
514.3 | DECslide will 'sixelize' | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Looking at the big sky | Tue Jun 16 1987 09:56 | 11 |
|
You can turn ASCII files into sixel files by using DECslide with
the command;
$SLIDE/NOINTERACTIVE/SIXEL MY_ASCII_FILE.TXT
This will produce a sixel file named MY_ASCII_FILE.SLS.
Lance
|
514.4 | Please refrain from personal attacks | CLOSET::ADLER | | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:16 | 8 |
| RE: .2
Note 514.2 has been deleted due to abusive language which does not have
a place in this notesfile. Please don't take this as a stifling of differences
of opinion. Differences of opinion are welcome; personal attacks, however,
are not.
--Brian
|
514.5 | Apology | DECWET::KOSAK | | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:52 | 17 |
| I would like to apologize to anyone who took offense at my first
reply to this topic. I didn't get a chance to read .2 before it
was deleted, so I'm not sure what the problem was.
I realize that many people may not have access to a workstation
or PRO, and would therefore need PICMODE to produce any kind of
"illustration" online. My reply was aimed at those that have a
choice and still opt for PICMODE. Still, I hope that PICMODE is
never used in documents that land in the hands of our customers.
I would also encourage every group that doesn't have some kind of
computer that can handle graphics applications to start budgeting
for one. It won't be long before you really can't do without it.
Apologetically,
-- Craig
|
514.6 | | MARTY::FRIEDMAN | | Tue Jun 16 1987 14:49 | 10 |
| It's true that workstations are the wave of the future, but I think
that a lot of people will be sticking with plain old terminals for
awhile.
It's ironic that [what I think is] a major raison d'etre of DOCUMENT
is to have a cheap formatting tool (so that people who don't have
workstations can do nice output), yet there is no support for the
VT100 line drawing set. I can see how this would be frustrating.
Marty
|
514.7 | Sorry -won't happen again. | FNYFS::WYNFORD | The Rented Loony | Tue Jun 16 1987 15:22 | 12 |
| Re: .2 and .4
I was the culprit in note .2 and I apologise for the outburst. This
was brought on by the frustration we have over here of dealing with
technology (internal) which is way out-of-date and never seems to
get upgraded. We rely on PICMode and LN01s here so you may see why
I was upset.
Gut reactions get you nowhere. I reread my note before posting it
and wondered...
Gavin
|
514.8 | An observation and suggestion | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little NJCD SWS 323-4475 | Wed Jun 17 1987 01:23 | 14 |
| I hope I'm not rubbing salt in any wounds, but with the price of
VS2000 being dropped to $5-10K range, that makes the internal price
$1-2K. Its hard to believe that any manager could argue an expense
hit of $400-$800/year for roughly 3 years to capitalize one of those
things.
We in Software Services also know the pain of dealing with out of date
equipment (within the last year we finally got rid of our last VT52's
and VT62's in our office!!!) But we've also discovered that unless you
make a case for what you need in dollars and cents (sense?) and in
writing, you rarely get anywhere.
-tl
|
514.9 | Hmmm... | FNYFS::WYNFORD | The Rented Loony | Wed Jun 17 1987 05:27 | 9 |
| I don't wish to duplicate an argument running in HUMAN::DIGITAL
but there is a difference between theory and practice. Additionally,
this side of the pond things are slow. Wanna see an example? We
ordered a couple of LN03s last September. They arrived three weeks
ago minus the RAM cartridges required for DOC'T! We are a support
group - for most of our needs we can use VT220s so who is going
to buy anything bigger?
Gavin
|