[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vaxuum::document_ft

Title:DOCUMENT T1.0
Notice:**New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)**
Moderator:CLOSET::ADLER
Created:Mon Feb 09 1987
Last Modified:Thu Oct 31 1991
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:897
Total number of notes:4397

394.0. "Gutentagshr.exe not found during IVP" by WONDER::SYSTEM () Tue May 19 1987 16:59

    
    	Trying to install the T1.0 version of DOCUMENT here and
    	have been getting this error during the IVP;
    
    	ERROR ACTIVATING IMAGE DOC$GUTENTAGSHR
    	IMAGE FILE NOT FOUND  [DOCTOOLS.TOOLS]GUTENTAGSHR.EXE
    
    	Anyone with a suggestion or two?
    
    	BTW, I followed the installation procedure in note 1.1
    
    	-TB
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
394.1Beware of old logicalsCRAYON::GENTParty gone out of bounds -- B52'sTue May 19 1987 17:2212
    If you are installing the field test update (BL08), beware
    that you may have an old /SYSTEM logical for DOC$ROOT that
    can mess things up. DOC$ROOT is now defined as /SYSTEM/EXEC.
    You may need to go back an undefine the supervisor-mode
    logical by hand:
    
    	$ DEASS/SYSTEM DOC$ROOT
    
    I mention this because the error message implies it is looking
    in [DOCTOOLS...] not the latest [DOC$TOOLS...]
    
    --Andrew
394.2is this 7 or 8?CLOSET::ANKLAMTue May 19 1987 17:4410
    
    re: 1.1
    
    I'll have to figure out how to remove/replace that, since it is
    no longer necessary to run the partial installations for device
    support. I don't think this has anything to do with the problem
    in .0 here.
    
    Are you installing BL7 or BL8 ?
    
394.3confusedWONDER::SYSTEMWed May 20 1987 10:4610
    I believ the kit is BL7.  The release notes in the kit are dated
    Feb 20, 1987.
    
    I was under  the impression, after reading note 1.1, that a partial
    installation was needed to support all devices after doing an 
    initial FULL INSTALLATION and saying YES only to lineprinter support.
    
    Am I missing something here?
    
    -Confused
394.4two baselevelsCLOSET::ANKLAMWed May 20 1987 11:376
    
    No, you're not missing anything. Note 1.1 applies to Base Level
    7, in which the full and several partials were required.
    
    The problem was fixed in Base Level 8, for which there is a new
    kit (as of last week). 
394.5Should I go to BL8 instead of 7?WONDER::SYSTEMWed May 20 1987 14:423
	
    Well if I were to install BL8 instead of BL7, would any users have
    a problem in converting their BL6 files to the new baselevel?
394.6yesCLOSET::ANKLAMWed May 20 1987 17:0310
    
    They would have to convert their files, just as they would have
    had to for Base Level 7. The are in a little bit better position
    than people who installed base level 7, because the converter has
    been kept up to date with bug reports.
    
    So, yes, you should go to bl8. There is no difference as far as
    the users are concerned, but there are a fair number of bug fixes.
    
    patti