T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
391.1 | | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Tue May 19 1987 14:22 | 7 |
| I don't recall the number, but another note in this conference proposed
exactly the same thing you have. Sounds like a great idea to me. What
priority does this have on the wishlist, I wonder?
Rose
|
391.2 | no numbers | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue May 19 1987 15:24 | 3 |
|
nothing on the wishlist has a priority yet. I think that's what
the phase review process is for...
|
391.3 | Possible hitch | CLOSET::ADLER | | Wed May 27 1987 19:54 | 5 |
| While I do it all the time (without any problems), I believe that
the LN03 documentation prohibits you on pain of violating your maintenance
contract from running pages through the machine multiple times.
--Brian
|
391.4 | Do it, but don't yell if you have problems! | NCADC1::PEREZ | The sensitivity of a dung beetle. | Wed May 27 1987 23:02 | 8 |
| We run our software listings double-sided landscape on projects.
Field Service never threatened our maintenance contract, but they
weren't too sympathic when we had paper feed problems. Some brands
of paper we used worked great, others stunk!! They constantly wrinkled
and messed up. Unfortunately, the major offender is the paper they
normally buy here!!!
Dave
|
391.5 | LN03's may be more expensive too | IJSAPL::KLERK | Theo de Klerk | Thu May 28 1987 14:54 | 18 |
| Re. -2:
What they also did not tell us and a few customers who bought
LN03's is that FS will charge an extra amount per page printed
that exceeds the number of sheets the LN03 was meant to print
in that period.
Stating that this is around 3000/month (or was it weeks? - cannot
remember), if you did 6000 that month and called FS they also
charged you (6000 - 3000) * a specific amount of money.
Being a S/W specialist and not a marketing/FS person, I sympathize
with customers having to pay a sur-charge. It's like paying
double because your VAX has made 50 minutes of CPU time work too
much this month...
A slightly irritated
Theo
|