T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
379.1 | How about BL8-related keywords? | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Thu May 14 1987 18:34 | 6 |
| Is it desirable to set up some new bl8-related keywords for this
conference? Perhaps add a set of new keywords, same as the "old" ones,
but preceded or succeded (sp?) by _BL8_ ? Or some other nomenclature?
Rose
|
379.2 | I'm confused here | JAWS::STRYKER | Stew Stryker | Fri May 15 1987 12:06 | 5 |
| What's the difference between this version (T1.0) and the version
I'm already running, that was available a month ago (T1.0)?
Does this have additional bug fixed, yet is not the SDC product?
Should I install it, or wait for the SDC version?
|
379.3 | bug fixes/some new fonts | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Fri May 15 1987 13:02 | 8 |
|
It is principally bug fixes, though the enhancements for multinational
character support are very important for European sites. You
can copy/read the release notes file to see whether any of the bug
fixes, etc. are important. If not, you can wait for the SDC version.
patti
|
379.4 | new doc010.B | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Fri May 15 1987 13:53 | 5 |
|
I have just been informed that DOC010.B in KITS_:[DOCUMENT] was
truncated. I have place a new version there.
-pa
|
379.5 | Er, ah, ok to go from BL06 to BL08? | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Fri May 15 1987 13:57 | 12 |
| Bizarre as it sounds, there are still a few BL06 files hanging around
here. Are there any problems updating from BL06 to BL08? Is
DOC$CONVERT in BL08, or should we convert all files before installing
BL08?
Also, are there any more updates planned between now and FRS?
Thanx
Rose
|
379.6 | BL06 to BL08 Conversion is OK | VAXUUM::WILLETT | | Fri May 15 1987 15:47 | 7 |
| The converter will translate Bl6 to Bl8.
The new version (V1.7) translates to an .SDML file
(which gets rid of the renaming problems). It also
has some bug fixes and reports the number of definitions
deleted.
|
379.7 | You need to get the latest version | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Mon May 18 1987 09:39 | 44 |
| There are still a lot of BL6 files around here, also. There shouldn't
be any problem going from BL6 to BL8. BL8 is the last update before
we go to the SDC.
The latest version of the converter (1.7, which uses SDML for the
output filetype) was not in the BL08 kit. It can be copied from
CLOSET::KITS_:[DOCUMENT]DOC$CONVERT_06_FILES.EXE
It has the following bug fixes:
Version 1.7
o Translates <NOHELP> to <BOOK_ONLY>
o Translates <KEYPHRASE> to <KEYWORD>
o Prints the number of definitions deleted at the end
of processing and lists each one of the deleted
definitions in the list file. Many people are
disturbed to find these definitions deleted so
this action calls attention to the deletion and
provides information about which definitions
deleted.
o Encloses the following tags in a comment:
<DOCUMENT_TITLE>(full-name))
<WRITER>(writer-name[\...])
<EDITOR>(editor-name[\...])
<DPN>(discrete-project-number)
<ORDER_NUMBER>(order-number)
<STATUS>(document-status)
<PRODUCTION_INFORMATION>
<ENDPRODUCTION_INFORMATION>
<HISTORY>(previous-version)
<ENDHISTORY>(previous-version)
<TITLE>(element-title)
<TEXT_TYPE>(type)
<SPECIAL_INFORMATION>
<ENDSPECIAL_INFORMATION>
<HAS_FIGURE>(<name-in-text>\etc.)
|
379.8 | Copy the Documentation From NEWDOC | CLOSET::ETZEL | Mike | Mon May 18 1987 11:58 | 9 |
| We would prefer that people copy the documentation from NEWDOC::[sdml.bl8]
instead of CLOSET::USE3$:[sdml.bl8]. Also, if people could copy
the kit during off-peak hours, that would be appreciated.
Because of the number of processes using network access (about 30
right now), users may be getting the "insufficient resources at
remote node" trying to copy files or otherwise access CLOSET/VAXUUM.
Mike
|
379.9 | Doc question | TOPDOC::GREENBERG | | Mon May 18 1987 16:09 | 12 |
|
How does this documentation differ from the User's Guide, Parts
1 and 2 for Fields Test Draft?
Should bl6 users be given this new set rather than the fields test
draft volumes? Is conversion from 6 to 8 addressed here, or should
bl6 users use bl7 and bl8 documentation to navigate through the
changes?
Thanks,
Fern
|
379.10 | not significantly different | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Mon May 18 1987 17:05 | 10 |
|
It consists up updates and corrections made to the documents, many
of which were made as a result of comments we received. If you
haven't used bl7, there is no reason to use it; the copious
release notes from base level 6 should be used as a guide to tag
name changes, etc. (I also recommend reading the notes in this
conference about conversion)
patti
|
379.11 | BL07 documentation .vs. BL08 | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Mon May 18 1987 19:43 | 7 |
| How much difference is there really?
I mean, we have at least 75 people using Document, and we just finished
copying 75 complete BL07 docsets ... I really don't look forward to doing
another 100.
Ken
|
379.12 | Copy of kit in area 32 | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little NJCD SWS 323-4475 | Tue May 19 1987 01:16 | 9 |
| The files are available along with some of the documentation at:
{TIPPLE,IMBIBE,OBIWAN}""::DISK$USER04:[KITS.DOCUMENT]
Those nodes are in area 32 in the New York/New Jersey Area. Please
feel free to copy the files from there if so desired. Lastly our
preference would be that you copy them off hours.
-tl
|
379.13 | revision/not new | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue May 19 1987 08:25 | 9 |
|
Documentation differences are really not major; the missing chapter
1 of the UG is now in place, as is the missing <preface> tag. For
the rest, it's the usual miscellaneous insertions/corrections you
normally get during field test review. In short, no new functionality
is documented in BL8 that wasn't present in BL7.
patti
|
379.14 | Just installed BL08 | PDVAX::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis (aka SARAH::P_DAVIS) | Tue May 19 1987 14:26 | 14 |
| If I have installed BL8, and am NOT interested in maintaining any
BL7 compatability, can I just delete everything under [DOCTOOLS...]?
I'd really like to free up the disk space.
Also, in the installation procedure, the default answer to the question
"Do you want to supply another destination and queue name?" is "YES".
Why is that? I would assume that most people would only use one
destination/queue for each device type. Inadvertently typing <CR>
at this point can make the installation unpleasant.
Finally, I asked for a POSTSCRIPT destination for the IVP. The
messages said everything queued ok, but nothing printed.
-pd
|
379.15 | no need to keep BL7 | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue May 19 1987 15:25 | 6 |
|
Yes, you can remove the old [DOCTOOLS...] once you're satisfied
that BL8 is working properly. (We didn't want to throw out a system
from under people who are on tight production schedules.)
|
379.16 | Ditto on the YES default trap | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Tue May 19 1987 22:53 | 5 |
| re: .14, I did the same thing accidentally accepting the YES default
for another round on the queue queries. Me thinks the NO default
is definitely the safer and more friendly setting.
jack
|
379.17 | | WHOARU::HARDING | | Wed May 20 1987 09:43 | 10 |
| If there is still a need for any one to copy the kit I have put
it on system ::
CADDLE""::DISK$BEARS:[SDML.BL8]
And yes you can get it during normal working hours.
dave
|
379.18 | fail safe, but not easy enough to recover | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Wed May 20 1987 18:22 | 31 |
| I thought a lot about the YES or NO default on the question
about whether you want to supply another destination/queue name.
Here is the reasoning:
If you are in the habit of hitting RETURNs to take the defaults,
and the default is NO, then it will be too late to input any more
destination/queue name entries for this device type. So, I
regard the YES default as a "fail safe" for people who have
more than one of a given device type.
However, as you have noted, the default leaves you back at the position
of inputting another destination name. MOST users will have
only one destination, so they will say "Uh, oh! What do I do now?"
Well, they MIGHT look in the Installation Guide. It tells you what
to do. (It says, "If you make a mistake and press RETURN you will
be prompted for a new destination and queue name. You can supply
any values, and then when you are asked to confirm the values,
just reply NO.")
For the final kit I see I need to add more for users who don't
have/read the Installation Guide. The second time around on the
query for destination name it provides no default value. But at
the moment it requires that you enter something. I will make it
possible to enter nothing (just press RETURN) and it will jump ahead
to the question about "supplying another destination..." I'll
also put a more elaborate help message in for those who type "?".
Thanks for the comments.
|
379.19 | Typical "dumb" user | PDVAX::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis (aka SARAH::P_DAVIS) | Wed May 20 1987 18:52 | 4 |
| As a veteran VMSINSTALler, I seldom, if ever, read the installation
guide. Sometimes I don't even read the prompts.
I still vote for making "NO" the default.
|
379.20 | I would also still vote for NO as the default | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Wed May 20 1987 19:22 | 5 |
| After all, you've made it much easier to now change/add destination
definitions and assignements, so missing the change at installation
time is no longer such a big deal.
jack
|
379.21 | Consciousness | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu May 21 1987 10:09 | 4 |
| I think I will remove the default -- that way you have to
consciously (well, more or less consciously) type SOMETHING
to go in either direction. And if you just press RETURN
it just repeats the same prompt.
|
379.22 | Kit now available in KIWI::DOCUMENT$KIT: | SANTEE::GREENE | Michael Greene | Thu May 21 1987 12:00 | 7 |
| A copy of the kit is now available at MRO in:
KIWI::DOCUMENT$KIT:
It's available (save a catastrophe!) 24 hours a day...
Regards
|
379.23 | BL 8 kit for Europe & neighbours | IJSAPL::KLERK | Theo de Klerk | Thu May 28 1987 14:39 | 12 |
| For the European side:
the entire installation kits with LN03 documentation files can also
be copied from
IJSAPL::$1$DJA19:[KIT.DOC]*.*
(BL 8).
Theo
(IJSAPL is the SWAS VAX 8650 at Digital's HQ in the Netherlands)
|
379.24 | Copy of distribution in MKO2 | BM1GSG::GROLLMAN | GSG Systems Engineering | Thu May 28 1987 17:54 | 9 |
| A copy of the kit is available as:
bm1gsg::shelf$disk:[doc010] (savesets, installation, and release documents)
bm1gsg::shelf$disk:[doc010.doc] (remaining documents)
bm1gsg::shelf$disk:[doc010.design_samples] (how to's)
bm1gsg::shelf$disk:[doc010int] (savesets for internal use materials)
bm1gsg::shelf$disk:[docln03010] (savesets for internal use LN03)
Regards, Ira Grollman (GSG Systems Engineering)
|
379.25 | Any more patches ?? | UTRWAR::HOFLAND | | Tue Jun 09 1987 08:24 | 19 |
| ! < Note 379.7 by CLOSET::ANKLAM >
! -< You need to get the latest version >-
!
!
! The latest version of the converter (1.7, which uses SDML for the
! output filetype) was not in the BL08 kit. It can be copied from
!
! CLOSET::KITS_:[DOCUMENT]DOC$CONVERT_06_FILES.EXE
Before I install BL08, are there more patches on the BL08 Kit ??
Eric Hofland
|
379.26 | a few | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue Jun 09 1987 11:08 | 11 |
|
A few files (all in CLOSET::KITS_:[DOCUMENT])
- CUP$LOCAL_ELEMENTS.TEX should replace the one in DOC$LOCAL_FORMATS.
This has a correction for the declogo for POSTSCRIPT output.
- TEX$REPORT.DESIGN corrects a typo in the table of contents format.
- AUTODEST.EXE is an updated version of Autodest.
patti
|