Conference vaxuum::document_ft

333.0. "Multiple <TO> entries breaks MEMO severly" by COOKIE::WITHERS (Le plus ca change...) Fri May 01 1987 18:07

Multiple TO: recipients causes some very strange results in the MEMO
style.  Please see attached:
                            o
                         \ /
--------------------------x-------Cut Here---------------------------
                         / \
                            o

<include_tex_file>(tem:pretol.tex)
<INCLUDE>(nh$templates:ckdoc_tags.GDX)
<include_tex_file>(tem:diddle_margins.tex)

<TO>(First Recipient\Second Recipient)
<comment>(<MEMO_DATE>(1-APR-1987))
<FROM>(Bob Withers)
<DEPT>(CXO Database Systems CSSE)
<EXT>(522-3729)
<MAILSTOP>(CX01-2/Q12)
<ENETADDR>(Withers at Cookie)

<CCLIST>
<CC>(Third Recipient)
<CC>(Yet Another Recipient)
<ENDCCLIST>
<SUBJECT>(Multiple people in a TO line of a memo breaks things badly)
<Running_Title>(<emphasis>(<DATE>))
<Running_feet>(<emphasis>(For )<emphasis>(DIGITAL \BOLD)<emphasis>( Internal 
Use Only))
                            o
                         \ /
--------------------------x-------Cut Here---------------------------
                         / \
                            o

 







INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM


TO:      First Recipient           DATE: May 1, 1987
                                   FROM: Second Recipient
                                   DEPT: Corporate User Publications
                                   EXT:
                                   LOC:
                                   FROM: Bob Withers
                                   DEPT: CXO Database Systems CSSE
                                   EXT:  522-3729
                                   LOC:  CX01-2/Q12
                                   ENET: Withers at Cookie


cc:      Third Recipient
         Yet Another Recipient


SUBJECT: Multiple people in a TO line of a memo breaks things badly





















                       For DIGITAL Internal Use Only  1