| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 309.1 | Here, here! | JAWS::STRYKER | Stew Stryker | Mon Apr 27 1987 13:12 | 1 |
| I'll second that suggestion.
|
| 309.2 | suggestion noted -- and thanks | VAXUUM::DEVRIES | Those are features, not bugs | Mon Apr 27 1987 14:49 | 12 |
| Provisions for duplex (two-sided) printing are high on our wishlist
for the next version. It gets really complicated (what doesn't?),
because in the near future there will be *real* duplex printers
available to the masses, and the techniques for "manual" duplex
may not be the same as those for "automatic" duplex.
In any case, we have had some preliminary discussions on the subject,
and once V1.0 is out the door, we'll look at this much more closely.
Thanks for your votes.
Mark
|
| 309.3 | at the least ... | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Mon Apr 27 1987 21:56 | 3 |
| The minimum requirement would be top at least put in the extra "blank"
pages at the end of chapters that don't end on an even page.
jack
|
| 309.4 | Second the previous motion! | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little NJCD SWS 323-4475 | Tue May 05 1987 18:57 | 5 |
| Yes, please consider the "extra" blank pages ability for V1.0. I cannot
get our secretaries to consistantly make two sided copies because of
the confusion due to the missing verso pages.
-tl
|