T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
308.1 | | CUPOLA::HAKKARAINEN | Albatross! | Mon Apr 27 1987 11:42 | 15 |
| Remembering that we're marking elements of text, not providing
formatting instructions, I don't think that multiple <p>'s should
be gobbled by Document. The intuitive behavior that I expect is
that Document should give me consistent output for my input.
There is no implicit <p> prior to a note; the formatting requirements
of <note> in that particular doctype call for added space.
It seems that there's a lot of extra work needed when trying to
interpret what a user intended with a <tag_a><tag_b> combination. But,
if something is going to be done like that, then the front-end
processor should delete the superfluous tags, simplifying subsequent
passes.
kh
|
308.2 | "marking text" is the point here | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Mon Apr 27 1987 13:50 | 21 |
| On the other hand, why should DOCUMENT do anything with a <p> with
no associated text? A <p> that stands by itself like in <p><p> causes
white space to appear for both instances; based on your statement
that we are "marking text", there is no text marked for the first
<p> so why should the output reflect this with white space, as opposed
to no effect at all? I really want the <p> tag to work like it
was "marking text" and cause the paragraph-start processing to occur
when the first character of the paragraph is encountered, not when
the tag is encountered. Seems to me that encountering an immediate
tag such as <note> or <head1> or something that is a "major" formatting
tag should override the effect of the <p> and cancel it, but as
it is now, the <p> seems to "get in its licks" before the new tag
gets a chance to do its job.
The appearance of the <note> section as separated from the rest
of the paragraph does not appear to me the reader much different
from the same effect that a <p> tag has. This is why I refered
to the implicit <p> action that seems to be associated with the
beginning of the note.
|
308.3 | guilty as charged! | GLINKA::GREENE | | Thu Apr 30 1987 12:10 | 9 |
| I know that I "shouldn't" but I have made great use of the
multiple <p> tag in forcing spaces (especially to make more
space after a header, or to force a nice clean page break).
I'm sure that there are many of us who have used little tricks
like this to do what we wanted/needed because either there was
no proper way or we just didn't know what it was.
Penelope
|
308.4 | needs thought/work | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Fri May 01 1987 13:30 | 12 |
|
The use of multiple <p> tags to produce extra space is one of
those 'holes' in the system that are current abused as 'features'.
Jack is correct that we should probably discard multiple occurrences
of <p> tags, or to discard <p> tags in front of text elements that
provide their own spacing. Fixing this is extremely complex, and
will require a good deal of internal work; will add to the list
of things to look at post-V1.
-patti
|