[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vaxuum::document_ft

Title:DOCUMENT T1.0
Notice:**New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)**
Moderator:CLOSET::ADLER
Created:Mon Feb 09 1987
Last Modified:Thu Oct 31 1991
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:897
Total number of notes:4397

267.0. "<SCAN> not working when first tag on line" by CSC32::K_WROBEL (Those who can, do ... - CSC/CS Employee Training) Thu Apr 16 1987 15:36

<SPAN> does not appear to be working correctly in the context of the 
<TABLE_HEADS> tag.  I have enclosed 2 table definitions.  One produces the 
output expected, the other does not (actually the first one is the one with 
the problem).  The only difference in the 2 tables is the placement of the 
carriage return with respect to the <SCAN> tag.

I have tried this with GENERAL and OVERHEADS for output on LN03, TERM, 
MAIL, all with the same results.

Thanks,

	Kathy
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

<table>(This table fails)
<table_setup>(7\10\5\5\5\5\5)
<table_heads>(Mode of Requested\
<span>(5)Mode of Currently Granted Locks<rule>)
<table_heads>(Lock\NL\CR\CW\PR\PW\EX)
<table_row>(NL\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes)
<endtable>

<table>(This table works)
<table_setup>(7\10\5\5\5\5\5)
<table_heads>(Mode of Requested\<span>(5)Mode of 
Currently Granted Locks<rule>)
<table_heads>(Lock\NL\CR\CW\PR\PW\EX)
<table_row>(NL\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes\Yes)
<endtable>
 
           _______________________________________________________
           Table_1:_This_table_fails______________________________
                       *-5
                       Mode
                       of
                       Cur-
                       rently
           Mode of     Granted
           Requested   Locks

           Lock________NL_____CR_____CW_____PR_____PW_____EX______
           NL          Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes
           _______________________________________________________

           _______________________________________________________
           Table_2:_This_table_works______________________________
           Mode of
           Requested   _Mode_of_Currently_Granted_Locks_
           Lock________NL_____CR_____CW_____PR_____PW_____EX______
           NL          Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes    Yes
           _______________________________________________________
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
267.1<SPAN> is feeling ignoredCOOKIE::JOHNSTONFri Apr 24 1987 12:0111
I'm curious about whether 267 is a known bug or expected behavior or 
something else; especially since I told Kathy "Hey!  Enter a note into 
DOCUMENT_FT!" 

Did this get lost in the melee?  If you're looking at it, all we need is
a reply to that effect; then we can, again, start sleeping at night!


Thanx

Rose
267.2will checkCLOSET::ANKLAMFri Apr 24 1987 12:324
    
    it is on my list to look at; it hasn't fallen through the cracks.
    
    patti
267.3non-violent principles hereVAXUUM::KOHLBRENNERFri Apr 24 1987 14:436
    what's this "melee?"
    
    Melee: a hand-to-hand fight among several people, a confused
           struggle.
    
    ;-)
267.4Gee, I always wondered what it meantCOOKIE::JOHNSTONFri Apr 24 1987 15:198
You are a truly unique group if you don't feel like you are in a 
confused struggle just before a new release.  Patent the method for 
keeping it to even a semi-confused struggle, and you could make mucho
$$$. 

|-)

Rose