T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
234.1 | need more data | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu Apr 09 1987 18:49 | 10 |
| Can't imagine why that is happening, can you capture the
output and send it to me? VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER
if you say
$ SET HOST/LOG 26315
and then login again and run DOCUMENT, then LOGOUT,
you'll have a SETHOST.LOG file that has all the terminal
dialogue in it.
|
234.2 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Fri Apr 10 1987 19:10 | 15 |
| I've seen some inconsistencies and misbehavior, too. My guess is
that DOCUMENT isn't getting the status right in all cases. I'll
try to get a better handle on this the next time it happens.
I have noticed that if you leave out any of the command line
parameters on the LSE COMPILE, then the error message you get back
is not particularly clear, partially due to LSE's limitation to
a two/three line message window. I think the ideal solution is
to not require more than one parameter on the DOCUMENT command line,
but it may be too late for this. If DOCUMENT can't do that, then
I suggest working with the LSE people to improve the interface;
the LSE project is going to have to study the compile command anyway,
for some other reasons.
Gary
|
234.3 | Did you execute DOC$STARTUP? | NCADC1::PEREZ | The sensitivity of a dung beetle. | Wed May 13 1987 00:14 | 6 |
| This may have nothing to do with the problem, but we are running
the T1.0-008 version on CAADC. The system was rebooted and on
startup DOC$STARTUP did NOT get executed. From inside LSE the
compile failed with the -- unable to open .DIA file error.
Dave
|
234.4 | not that | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Wed May 13 1987 12:40 | 4 |
|
no, I don't think that has anything to do with it. COMPILE is not
working, as is noted in the release notes.
|
234.5 | No .DIA and generating BL6 syntax | MARVIN::MTHOMAS | | Wed May 13 1987 12:59 | 10 |
| I seem to have the same problem with the COMPILE/REVIEW command
and would be interested in the answer.
To compound matters, my LSE seems to be generating BL6 syntax.
We're running Document BL7 and LSE V2. The LSE environment file
in sys$library is dated February 87 which should be ok. Can you
suggest what we need to do to fix this.
cheers Mike Thomas
|
234.6 | Possible fix | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little NJCD SWS 323-4475 | Wed May 13 1987 13:16 | 25 |
| Did you previously include the BL6 LSE environment into your system-wide
LSE environment file? If so, the installation procedure probably didn't
properly update the system-wide environment file. The simplest fix is to
modify the KITINSTAL.COM file that is in saveset A (I'm assuming that the
kitinstal used in BL7 is similar to the initial BL8 kitinstal which also
had this bug.) Extract all the files from saveset A into a subdirectory and
in KITINSTAL.COM there probably is a command such as:
$ lsedit/nodisp/nosyst/envi=(SDMLLSE.ENV)/nosect -
/command=(vmi$kwd:lseupdate_env.tpu)
change it to:
$ lsedit/nodisp/nosyst/envi=(SDML.ENV)/nosect -
/command=(vmi$kwd:lseupdate_env.tpu)
And rename the file SDMLLSE.ENV to SDML.ENV. Then BACKUP the latest version
of all the files in that subdirectory to DOC010.A and use this new saveset
A for your installation.
If that command does NOT exist in KITINSTAL.COM, then forget all this
nonsense and try something else.
-tl
|
234.7 | Read-only vs. Write Buffer | CLOSET::ETZEL | Mike | Wed May 13 1987 13:28 | 36 |
| First, under Bl7:
If your buffer is marked as a "Read-only" buffer (not "Write"), it
seems the .DIA file doesn't get written with a COMPILE. This makes
sense, since a COMPILE creates a new file (if the buffer has been
modified).
It also seems that if you have an existing file, it will compile
the existing file and not the version in your LSEDIT buffer. This
sounds like an LSEDIT (not DOCUMENT) behaviour.
To set the current buffer to Write, enter the LSE command:
LSE>SET WRITE
Then use:
LSE>COMPILE/REVIEW $ doctype dest
Under Bl8:
You can process the file and create a .DIA file before invoking LSEDIT
using the DOCUMENT qualifier /DIAGNOSTIC. You may have to process
outside LSEDIT if you have to use /BATCH anyhow. An example:
$ DOCU/DIAG/NOTEXT/BATCH file.SDML S.R LN03
$ LSEDIT file.sdml
.
.
.
LSE> REVIEW
You can use CTRL/G (GOTO SOURCE), and also CTRL/F and CTRL/B
to go to the next and previous errors.
|
234.8 | worth waiting for Bl8? | MARVIN::MTHOMAS | | Thu May 14 1987 08:12 | 4 |
| Thanks for the info gentlemen. How soon can I expect Bl8, do you
think? If it's not long, I can live with the syntax problem until
we reinstall.
|
234.9 | COMPILE/REVIEW ???? | DELNI::COLELLO | | Thu May 28 1987 09:57 | 17 |
| [beginning of compilation]
at text on line 0 in file
doc$bl07_root:[tex.formats]tag$software.stt
can't open output file:
sampchap1.int_tex
Is this error caused by the compile bug? I can't compile while
in LSEDIT. I can do:
$ doc/dia file design device
and get my .dia file. I can also do a review while in LSEDIT and
it will bring up my .dia file into a second window...
thanks,
Bette Jean
|
234.10 | Looks like same problem. | VAXUUM::KOHLBRENNER | | Thu May 28 1987 12:23 | 11 |
| Yes, I think it is the same error. it should happen on
the second attempt to do a COMPILE command, because the
tag translator left open the output file from the first
attempt. When it tries to open the same file again, the
I/O system says "you must be kidding!" and we exit with
the error message.
Fixed in V1.0.
If you exit from LSEDIT and go back into LSEDIT, you should
then be able to execute the COMPILE/REVIEW command (once).
|
234.11 | Init file | GNUVAX::TUCKER | | Wed Jun 17 1987 17:30 | 7 |
| This is another "getting started with" problem/question. I'm also
a relatively new user of LSE/DOCUMENT. In glancing through "Step
by Step" and poring over the online help files, I haven't seen
anything like init files discussed. How do you maintain settings
across sessions, like SET WRAP?
Brenda
|
234.12 | MODIFY LANGUAGE SDML/WRAP | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Wed Jun 17 1987 19:35 | 33 |
| Questions specific to LSE are best asked in the TLE::LSEDIT notes
file. (I know; it can be real tough to determine which notes file
is most appropriate, and for some questions, it isn't even obvious
to the developers.) In general, if your question doesn't refer
to an SDML tag or to a placeholder generated by SDML, the question
is probably about LSE.
In this case, any LSE setting that applies to a language can be set by
including a MODIFY LANGUAGE command in your LSE init file. You can
determine the available language settings by using the LSE command
"HELP MODIFY LANGUAGE"; most of these are uninteresting, but some
are very interesting. Since WRAP is such a setting, you set it with
either
MODIFY LANGUAGE SDML /WRAP
to just set it for SDML, or
MODIFY LANGUAGE * /WRAP
to set it for all languages. If you also want WRAP turned on for
buffers that do not have a language (e. g. if you use LSE as your
MAIL editor), you should also include the command
SET WRAP
which turns on WRAP for the $DEFAULT buffer, and hence for any new
buffer that has no associated language.
The LSE initializatin file can be specified at the LSE command line,
by /INITIALIZATION=, or by the LSE$INITIALIZATION logical.
Gary
|