T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
137.1 | Lost in a q reg | CUPOLA::HAKKARAINEN | Albatross! | Mon Mar 23 1987 08:40 | 9 |
| To my knowledge, no one is working on a DSR[plus] to BL07 SDML converter.
Interesting problem here. There is a diminishing need for a DSR->SDML
converter within DEC; the majority of the pages have already been
converted. Customers, however, are starting to fuss about such a gadget
as they become familiar with Document.
Anyone have a programmer sitting idly by? I have a Teco manual I
can lend.
|
137.2 | Any volunteers? | VAXUUM::WILLETT | | Mon Mar 23 1987 10:38 | 9 |
| I have updated my dsr to bl6 converter so that it now converts
to bl7.
It handles the obvious things and a definition list cliche.
I wonder how many people are interested in converting DSR
table utility files?
Would anyone like to volunteer to test out this converter?
|
137.3 | Volunteers here... | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Mon Mar 23 1987 13:57 | 10 |
| I'll test it; or at least I'll have some of my students test it.
They like nothing better than to try to break things!
Pointers, please.
Rose
|
137.4 | | TOPDOC::STANTON | I got a gal in Kalamazoo | Tue Mar 24 1987 23:57 | 5 |
|
We would like a crack at breaking, er, testing it too. Much
interest in such a tool...
|
137.5 | This is a *needed tool* | TALLIS::GALLAGHER | | Wed Mar 25 1987 16:48 | 29 |
|
To add my "two cents worth" -- that is, to give my support to the
base note asking for a a converstion tool: I believe that such a tool
is a *highly desireable* utility, and as such, should be part of
the base product. My reasons follow.
Many groups within the company have not used early versions of SDML,
having taken a "wait and see" policy, waiting for the product to
become a bona-fide DEC product, then evaluating it like any other
DEC product. Many groups have been waiting for the user interface
to be improved, and this version is certainly a step in that direction.
There are groups within CUP that have taken this approach as well as
many other groups outside of CUP that do writing, course development, etc.
Also, many engineering groups (such as the one I'm working for)
have many many disk blocks full of specs and other textual material, in
simple DSR and DSR+.
The one thing most groups have in common is a very strong interest in
using this product (especially when they see the output), but it is
unrealistic to expect them to convert, without providing a supported
connversion utility. Don't forget how long DSR has been *the* DEC
standard text processing product.
I strongly believe that if DOCUMENT is going to enjoy success as
a product, this conversion utility should be made a supported tool,
and as such, treated the same as any other element in the product
set.
|
137.6 | | SUPER::MATTHEWS | Don't panic | Thu Mar 26 1987 16:49 | 5 |
| Speaking as a member of a writing group (Software Course Development)
that still has most of its material in DSR and expects to have to
convert it to Document, I agree the converter is essential.
Val
|
137.7 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Mon Mar 30 1987 11:57 | 5 |
| Re: .1
Maybe "the majority of the pages have already been converted" in
YOUR group, but certainly not in the group I work in! We're just
getting started! I anticipate that we'll be doing conversions for
at least the next year.
|
137.8 | -> .2 : Where is it ? | CEDEX::BIJAOUI | Surf and Destroy | Tue Mar 31 1987 04:24 | 7 |
| RE .2
I'd really like (like others, i'm sure) to test your converter.
Could you please give us the location of your converter ?
Thanx by advance,
Pierre.
|
137.9 | Still Waiting... | ZENSNI::DCHAVEZ | Dale C. - CXO3 Colo Spgs | Tue Mar 31 1987 17:49 | 3 |
| Another user waiting for a pointer...
Dale
|
137.10 | TABLE Converter | VAXUUM::ETZEL | Mike | Thu Apr 02 1987 15:12 | 7 |
| There was a converter that converted files created using the DSR
(+?) Table Utility to .GNC files. It was based on TECO. It is
still around but provides bl06 format tags, not T1.0.
Files are in NEWDOC::dua0:[writer.tools]TABLE*.*
I believe its author (George Woods) has since retired from DIGITAL.
|
137.11 | not ready yet | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Thu Apr 02 1987 17:11 | 6 |
|
Sorry it's not in a state worth sending out at present, mainly
because we don't have the time to support it (respond to bugs, etc.).
We'll post its availability when its ready.
patti anklam
|
137.12 | What the status of dsr>doc converter | MERCRY::BJAQUES | Doctor Bob | Mon Apr 27 1987 14:25 | 8 |
| OK a month has passed. Evidentally there was a translator and should
be one now.
Please.. What is the status. I am willing to test a converter that
does most of the work..
dr bob
|
137.13 | nothing to report, I think | VAXUUM::DEVRIES | Those are features, not bugs | Mon Apr 27 1987 14:59 | 9 |
| I don't know the status (the "status-ticians" are at DECUS all week) but
we've been cranking out the field test update, so please don't assume
we've spent the month on the DSR converter. We're not trying to hide
anything -- just busy, that's all.
Thanks, though, for checking in periodically. You will get a real
answer from someone who knows.
Mark
|
137.14 | Please send me a sample file | VAXUUM::WILLETT | | Tue May 05 1987 09:50 | 13 |
| The new DSR converter is now entering testing. Sorry to keep
you all waiting but we have been doing other things.
Before making a pointer available, I'd like to test it on a
variety of files myself. There is a lot of variation in the
way DSR is used and I'd like to see how the converter responds
to different styles.
I hope you will be able to use it yourself in about 10 days.
Thanks for your patience.
Helen
|
137.15 | a tester in waiting | PROSE::MOODY | | Wed May 06 1987 15:13 | 16 |
| -<a bomb ready to explode>-
Our writing group is just starting to get its feet wet using
DOCUMENT. We have probably hundreds and hundreds of thousands of
writer hours invested in dsr+ files and all hell will break loose
when a dsr+ --> SDML converter becomes available.
I agree with other replys in that a good converter is a must for
the product. I can't even begin to believe that a tiny fraction
of dsr files have been converted.
anxiously waiting
John
|
137.16 | Convertor available | DELNI::WIITANEN | | Wed May 20 1987 11:25 | 9 |
| I have a translator available for converting DSR to SDML. It resides
at delni::user$34:[wiitanen.document]. There are four files:
dsr2gnc.com, dsr2gnc.exe, dsr2gnc.lno, and dsr2gnc.ini. The lno
file is a manual. To install simply copy all files and modify
the com file to point to the exe's location. Get in touch with me
for more info.
Peter Wiitanen
|
137.17 | Is this the real thing? | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Wed May 20 1987 19:05 | 10 |
| Is this a different converter than what Helen Willett (name?) was working on
and testing recently?
If yes, could we have an update on the "official" converter?
Thanx
Rose
|
137.18 | Reality is in the eye of the beholder | VAXUUM::WILLETT | | Thu May 21 1987 10:46 | 16 |
| The "official" converter is in testing and should be available
"any day now".
Thanks to all of you who sent files. I am using them as a test
base.
DSR is a strange animal. 90% of its users are happy with 70%
of its functionality. That 70% is straightforward and easily
mapped into DOCUMENT. The rest is a little harder.
Also, because of DSR's limitations, users must be creative to
get desired results. Such creativity is often expressed in
different ways.
I hope the converter will be ready towards the end of next
week for you all to try.
|
137.19 | Protection woes | FNYFS::WYNFORD | The Rented Loony | Thu May 21 1987 11:14 | 7 |
| Re: .16
It might be available to you but not the rest of the world I'm afraid!
I think you need to check your protections...
Gavin
who found this out at 4am your time! :-)
|
137.21 | Don't have an LN01! | JEREMY::GIDEON | Fe is expensive, but Si is cheap | Wed May 27 1987 02:24 | 4 |
| > ...................................................... The lno file
is a brief manual.
Is there any manual available for sites that don't have an LN01?
formatter sources, ugly as they may be, are a lot better than nothing.
|
137.22 | Nor me neither | RDGENG::FRY | | Thu May 28 1987 06:13 | 9 |
|
...the .lno file...
Me, too! An LN03 version would be nice, but anything I can print
will do (back to the old LP!!).
(Please)
Andrew
|
137.23 | More on the "unofficial" translator | DELNI::WIITANEN | | Thu May 28 1987 13:56 | 30 |
| This reply replaces .20.
There are five files for the translator:
dsr2gnc.exe - the executable image
dsr2gnc.com - the command file
dsr2gnc.lno - brief documentation in ln01 format
dsr2gnc.ln3 - brief documentation in ln03 format
dsr2gnc.ini - an initialization file see doc.
These files must be copied individually because the directory is
protected.
In order to install dsr2gnc simply move all the files to a directory.
Edit the .com file and change the symbol dsr2gncdir to point to
this directory. If you wish a default printer for the user
documentation, change the symbol dsr2gncprinter to the default printer.
The print command prints the ln01 version; you may wish to change
this to the ln03 version.
NOTE
The translator is to BL6 ( a BL7 model is in the works).
The translator needs complete dsr commands or the legal abbrev.
Define a symbol dsr2gnc and equate it to @dsr2gnc.com in order
for the user documentation to be accurate.
Send mail if I can help you with bugs.
Peter
|
137.24 | I'm willing to wait...a week? | IJSAPL::KLERK | Theo de Klerk | Thu May 28 1987 15:00 | 8 |
| I'm not unfamilair with statements like "finished next week". It's
just that somehow we don't always seem to agree on the length of
a week. Martian weeks? Earth weeks? Lunar weeks?
Just kiddin', but when is the converter ready? I may give it a go
to modify my RNO-->LaTeX converter to do the same for Document...
Theo
|
137.25 | makesdf? | FORTY2::TATHAM | Nick Tatham @REO | Fri May 29 1987 13:09 | 4 |
| I've tried DSR2GNC. It expects to find MAKESDF - which we don't seem to
have on our system. Where do I look for that?
Nick
|
137.26 | YOU NEED MAKESDF | DELNI::WIITANEN | | Mon Jun 01 1987 10:32 | 4 |
| Unofficial Translator use of makesdf
ONCE AGAIN DSR2GNC TRANSLATES TO BL 6666666666666666.
|
137.27 | we're waiting... | DELNI::COLELLO | | Tue Jun 02 1987 09:44 | 1 |
| and the " official translator " ? Anything new?
|
137.28 | Don't stop me if you've heard this before... | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Tue Jun 16 1987 18:55 | 18 |
| Gee, we've ignored this for a few weeks. Methinks it's time to bring it
up again.
WHERE'S THE DSR ---> SDML CONVERTER ?????
I've promised *something* to students in a class I am teaching in two
weeks. If necessary, I'll take them through DSRGNC2 then DOC$CONVERT;
but I'd rather not.
Thanx
Rose
|
137.29 | | CLOSET::ADLER | | Tue Jun 16 1987 19:19 | 12 |
| Work on the converter has been suspended for the past couple of weeks due
to a resource shortage. Work is scheduled to resume next week and to take
approximately two months to complete. We will keep you posted as to progress
in replies to this note. We will not be making interim baselevels available
for general use until such time as the converter is robust enough to
consistently produce good SDML code. We may, however, continue to solicit
sample DSR files for our own use in testing the converter. (It's to
everyone's disadvantage for us to prematurely release the converter.)
I apologize for keeping you hanging.
--Brian
|
137.30 | Ok, thx -- dsr2gnc-->doc$convert is acceptable | COOKIE::JOHNSTON | | Tue Jun 16 1987 19:54 | 10 |
| Thanx, Brian; the prompt reply is appreciated!
I'll copy the DSR2GNC files referenced earlier and go the
DSR2GNC --> DOC$CONVERT route. I've had users do this before, and
it' actually not too painful for them so long as I'm explain strange
things up front, such as <delimit> tags.
Rose
|