| Title: | DOCUMENT T1.0 |
| Notice: | **New notesfile (DOCUMENT.NOTE) now available (see note 897)** |
| Moderator: | CLOSET::ADLER |
| Created: | Mon Feb 09 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Oct 31 1991 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 897 |
| Total number of notes: | 4397 |
I have had a few complaits, including myself, about the replacement for
the LAYERED format, i.e. software.reference, we what the large paper
size. The paragraph margin ident is way to far to the right. Actual
text only uses the right two thirds of the page, it looks un-balanced
and ugly. My questions are:
1) Do you agree with this or is it the way you designed it?
If you agree with me, will it be modified to be more pleasing?
2) I have tried changing it, moving the ident to the left, this
worked. But when using <COMMAND_SECTION> I got a lot of over
printing on the section names, e.g. "COMMAND PARAMETERS",
"QUALIFIERS" etc.
Any hope?
Peter
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102.1 | SOFT.HAND | CLOSET::ANKLAM | Fri Mar 13 1987 09:40 | 6 | |
LAYERED was replaced with SOFTWARE.HANDBOOK, not SOFTWARE.REFERENCE.
Are the release notes incorrect? I'll check. SOFTWARE.REFERENCE
replaced VMSREF...
| |||||
| 102.2 | Ummmmmm.... | SHIRE::ZGRAGGEN | Searching for infinity... | Fri Mar 13 1987 13:59 | 9 |
OK, I've re-read the release notes, correct s.h is the replacement for
layered and s.r is not. As I mentioned in .0 the reason we used s.r was
because of the page size, we await the arrival of the /PAGE_SIZE=A4
qualifier. I'll recommend that people use s.h for now.
But, the basic problem with s.r still remains, it is ugly, compared
to s.h to look at, it presents ifself as unbalanced, shifted.
Peter
| |||||