T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
38.1 | Logos in output | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Composed of laughing particles | Mon Mar 02 1987 15:37 | 15 |
|
If the logo is created as a sixel file it can be called into the
document with the <FIGURE_FILE> tag.
Sixel files can be edited to control their horizontal placement in the
output. By varying the point in the .GNC file at which the figure is
called and the amount of figurespace that's given, the figure (logo)
can be made to appear almost anywhere in the output.
I created a CUPSS logo for our group, and it's being used in headers
and footers. Contact me via mail if you would like to see examples of
the sixel and .GNC files.
Lance
|
38.2 | But I need one for postscript | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Mon Mar 02 1987 20:00 | 7 |
| That is fine for ln03 output. Has anyone done a DEC logo for the
postscript output. I have a postscript file that draws a DEC logo,
bu what we really need is to have it set up as an element of a
postscript font.
Ken Serack
|
38.3 | Some one has done it ... | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Mon Mar 02 1987 23:27 | 4 |
| The DEC logo on the copyright page is the 'boxed' format, like the
signs out front, when done in postscript. So, its around somewhere.
jack
|
38.4 | Looks Pretty When It Works | NANUCK::REHOR | I'd rather be golfing | Tue Mar 03 1987 05:00 | 36 |
|
I've been doing it in BL06 in the following manner:
<CENTER_LINE>(<INCLUDE_TEX_FILE>(digital.lgo))
where the TEX file DIGITAL.LGO is:
\declogo
but when I run this in BL07 I get the following:
(ENDOTRON$ROOT:[REHOR]LOGO.TEX;4 (DOC$ROOT:[TEX.FORMATS]DOC$STARTUP.TEX;1 (NL:[
].TEX;) (DOC$ROOT:[TEX.FORMATS]TAG$GENERAL.DTP;1 (DOC$ROOT:[TEX.FORMATS]TAG$STA
NDARD_FONTS.LN;1)) (DOC$ROOT:[TEX.LN03.FONTS]LN03CHARS.TEX;1)) (ENDOTRON$ROOT:[
REHOR]DIGITAL.LGO;1
%TEX-E-TEXERROR, Error found by TeX
%TEX-I-ONPAGE, on page [1]
%TEX-I-OUTFILENAME, 'endotron$root:[rehor]LOGO.DVI_LN3'
.
l.1 \declogo
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
))
No pages of output.
%TEX-I-PAGESOUT, 0 pages written.
%TEX-I-OUTFILENAME, 'endotron$root:[rehor]LOGO.DVI_LN3'
|
38.5 | | SANTEE::GREENE | Michael Greene | Tue Mar 03 1987 08:08 | 5 |
| The \declogo macro is no longer defined in system definitions in
T1.0. You have to add the definition to your doctype. There's a pointer
to this in the release notes...
Michael
|
38.6 | What about a tag? | DSSDEV::EPPES | Dignity, always dignity | Fri May 22 1987 15:42 | 36 |
| From the old DOCUMENT notes file:
<<< VAXUUM::W7_:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DOCUMENT.NOTE;4 >>>
-< Old Versions of DOCUMENT *Only*! >-
================================================================================
Note 369.0 Where is Digital Logo? 6 replies
NACHO::ROSENBERG 4 lines 22-SEP-1986 11:35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can somebody tell me how to put the Digital logo on the copypage.
Is there an existing Digital Logo file that can be used as an Icon?
<<< VAXUUM::W7_:[NOTES$LIBRARY]DOCUMENT.NOTE;4 >>>
-< Old Versions of DOCUMENT *Only*! >-
================================================================================
Note 369.1 Where is Digital Logo? 1 of 6
CLOSET::ANKLAM 9 lines 22-SEP-1986 19:00
-< \declogo >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no icon file. The DEC logo is produced from the TeX
macro \declogo. We don't provide any explicit tag that writes it
to the output file, but you should be able to create one. (I have
had this request before, and will try to include it as a 'local
special' in the next release.
patti anklam
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well...? :-)
-- Nina
|
38.7 | use at your own risk | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Tue May 26 1987 12:19 | 23 |
|
Yes, you're right I forgot. Until I get it into an internal release,
if you really need it you can define it yourself using
<define>(DECLOGO\^Tdeclogo^B^E)
where ^T, ^B and ^E are really the control characters
CTRL/T, CTRL/B and CTRL/E. You should put this a file that you specify
with /INCLUDE on the command line.
Note that what you get is what you get. You cannot change the size;
when you use it, it may do funny things to where related text is
set; it doesn't appear in running titles (because it is too big).
Support for it is not high on my list.
You must have the definition of \declogo someplace. (In
the DEC internal kit, it's in CUP$LOCAL_ELEMENTS.TEX; you may need
to define this file as DOC$LOCAL_ELEMENTS.) I will try to think
of somewhere to put it in the local kit (there's no tag definition
file corresponding to DOC$LOCAL_ELEMENTS...)
patti
|
38.8 | There is a .LN3 logo | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Looking at the big sky | Wed May 27 1987 15:40 | 7 |
|
I have a .LN3 DEC logo file which could be called into a .GNC file as
an icon or figure. If this is useful to you contact me.
Lance
|
38.9 | logo support? | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with u,... | Fri Jun 05 1987 18:34 | 3 |
| Is the logo feature suppored on the LPS40?
|
38.10 | I think so | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Looking at the big sky | Mon Jun 08 1987 09:50 | 9 |
|
It was not very precise for me to call the file I was refering to a
.LN3 file. It is a sixel file that is formatted for output on an LN03.
It was produced in GRED and processed through RENDER. RENDER can also
process files for output on LN03PLUS and Postscript devices. I haven't
tried the latter but I'm pretty sure it works.
Lance
|
38.11 | no jinete | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Mon Jun 08 1987 16:02 | 8 |
|
the definition in use via CUP$LOCAL_ELEMENTS doesn't print the
DEC logo as we are used to seeing it (white letters on black
background), it merely boxes the letters to give them a distinctive
appearance. We need to look further into font/character generative
for post script devices.
-pa
|
38.12 | POSTSCRIPT may have it right | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Mon Jun 08 1987 16:50 | 5 |
| Is it not true that the POSTSCRIPT version of the DEClogo is the
correct corporate logo? After all, the signs out front of the buildings
do not show white letters on a dark background.
jack
|
38.13 | who knows? | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Mon Jun 08 1987 16:55 | 4 |
|
You could be right. I know that there is (yet another) committee
at work on a 'corporate identity program'. Perhaps they will have
a word on the logo..
|
38.14 | standards and acceptable variations | CLOSET::KOHLBRENNER | | Mon Jun 08 1987 17:36 | 14 |
| I have a copy of a 1980 edition of the Corporate Identification
Manual (found in a trash bin one day) and it gives a lot of
detail about the corporate logo. It also gives a lot of
unacceptable variations.
In 1980, it gave some acceptable variations, one of which was
the standard lowercase letters in outlined boxes. That is,
the background is light, the box outline is dark, the inside
of the box is light and the letter is dark.
I've no idea of what the latest word is - haven't been around
to trashbins lately.
|
38.15 | The LPS40 can print either | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Mon Jun 08 1987 18:35 | 12 |
| I've noticed that if I print an .LN03 file on the LPS40, the logo
is printed white on black boxes, while the .POST version produces
the black on black outlined boxes. This shows that it's possible
to get either version on the LPS40, though it doesn't say anything
about how easy it is for Document to generate it.
I think that the white on solid black is as close as a black & white
printer can come to the white on blue, which is what official
stationery uses. Of course, the Legal Department may wish to express
an official opinion.
Gary
|
38.16 | | CLOSET::ADLER | | Mon Jun 08 1987 18:44 | 9 |
| > I think that the white on solid black is as close as a black & white
> printer can come to the white on blue, which is what official
> stationery uses.
I've seen official stationery with white on grey...
--Brian (who's calmly waiting for the dust to settle)
|
38.17 | Now lets get serious about this | BUNSUP::LITTLE | Todd Little NJCD SWS 323-4475 | Tue Jun 09 1987 00:49 | 6 |
| I think Jack is pushing for the OUTLINEd logo for an alterior motive.
Is it possible that he's right? That everything really does have
an outline?
-tl
|
38.18 | two colors only | CLOSET::KOHLBRENNER | | Tue Jun 09 1987 10:42 | 11 |
| the "old" corporate identification manual doesn't specify
the colors for the logo, it merely says that there are only
two colors. The "background" color, and the solid box color.
The letters which are cut out of the solid box should be the
same as the surrounding background. So you can have a black
box over a white background, in which case the letters are
white, or a blue box on gray paper, in which case the letters
are gray. But you can not have white letters on a black box
on grey paper.
|
38.19 | Actually, I would prefer consistency across the line | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Wed Jun 10 1987 14:24 | 11 |
| BTW, I'm as guilty as anyone. OUTLINE does it open boxes on all
printers except POSTSCRIPT where it does it with BLACK boxes.
Actually, I would prefer the outlined box approach because that's
the only one that can be done on pin printers like the LA50, LA100,
LA210, etc, and I generally vote for consistency.
We got both BLUE and GREY stationary down here. Some of us don't
carry any Civil War grudges any more.
Jack
|
38.20 | The Real McCoy | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Looking at the big sky | Wed Jun 10 1987 17:11 | 11 |
|
A trademark attorney in the Law Dept. told me that a Peter Phillips
was 'in charge' of the Digital logo. Something to do with Corporate
Identity (scary, huh!).
Anyhow, the OFFICIAL Digital trademark is with the letters themselves
being the same color as the background (white page = white letters), and
the boxes around the letters are supposed to be _filled in_ with a
contrasting color.
Lance
|
38.21 | at least its a consistent stance | ATLAST::BOUKNIGHT | Everything has an outline | Thu Jun 11 1987 14:04 | 4 |
| If so, I presume that the POSTSCRIPT version of the logo then needs
to get changed sometime.
jack
|
38.22 | Already on the list | CLOSET::SEGAL | | Thu Jun 11 1987 16:03 | 3 |
| Right.
Lee
|
38.23 | What tag to use ? | PNO::HEISERM | Celtics = World Champs | Thu Jun 11 1987 18:43 | 12 |
| Maybe I'm missing something. I'm also fairly new so bare with me.
I can't seem to get a logo on my title page. I don't know how to
get the logo out of CUP$LOCAL_ELEMENTS. Can someone give me a clue?
By the way, I'm running V1.0.
I also have the logo file sent out by Lance (GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN)
and couldn't get that to work either. I tried the <ICON> and the
<INCLUDE> tags with no luck.
Mike
|
38.24 | make your own, for now | CLOSET::ANKLAM | | Fri Jun 12 1987 09:22 | 2 |
|
see .7 (I will try to get this into the internal kit post-V1)
|
38.25 | This works | GNUVAX::LIBRARIAN | Looking at the big sky | Fri Jun 12 1987 10:33 | 21 |
|
I have always included graphics into Document using the <figure_file>
tag. Below is a BL.7 sample which I just tested and should work
correctly. If you still have problems contact me via MAIL and I'll try
to help.
I can also tell you how to control the horizontal and vertical position
of the logo on the output page.
Lance
<p>
This is text that appears above the figure.
<figure>(This is the Digital logo)
<figure_file>(ln03\dec_logo.ln3\2)
<endfigure>
This is text that appears below the figure.
|
38.26 | FYI | PNO::HEISERM | Mike Heiser @PNO | Wed Jul 01 1987 19:45 | 15 |
| For those of you that would like to try the DEC logo that in the
file mention in .7, you might try what I did. This logo is one
of the best I've seen.
Edit the .TEX file and insert a \declogo where you would like it
to appear. Works great for me but when doing this you must format
it using :
$ DOC/NOTAG file doctype dest
For an added thrill :-) try inserting the \copyrightline macro in
your copyright page.
Mike
|
38.27 | PostScript DEClogo?? | CONRAD::SERACK | Ken Serack | Thu Aug 13 1987 15:17 | 8 |
|
So, what is the final word on the PostScript DEC logo? Is is fixed
for V1.0, so that it is not the outlined boxes? If not, our writers
need to know what the plans are.
Thanks,
Ken Serack
|
38.28 | A bit more about the PostScript DEC logo | DECWET::KOSAK | | Thu Aug 13 1987 17:01 | 18 |
| I just wanted to mention one thing about the DEC logo in PostScript
implementations I have seen so far. It isn't totally correct. It
appears what is happening is that the Helvetica typeface is being
used. Well, most folks probably wouldn't notice, but our logo's
typeface is not Helvetica. In fact, it isn't any standard typeface
I can find. My guess is that it was originally rendered by hand.
That would mean the only way to faithfully reproduce the logo in
PostScript would be to scan it (using *at least* 1200 dpi), or to
recreate it using a tool such as Adobe Illustrator (which I think
would be best because it allows for resolution idenpendent scaling).
Our group will be getting Adobe Illustrator sometime in the near
future, and one of the first jobs I have in mind is to do a proper
version of our logo. If this would be of use to the DOCUMENT
developers please send me MAIL and we can work out the details.
-- Craig
|
38.29 | Design a loadable font? | CRAYON::GENT | Party gone out of bounds -- B52's | Fri Aug 14 1987 09:21 | 4 |
| Designing the logo as a PostScript font shouldn't be too hard,
should it?
--Andrew
|
38.30 | | BUNYIP::QUODLING | Ain't no time to wonder why... | Fri Aug 14 1987 21:05 | 10 |
| like any other problem it is a SMOP.
Simple Matter of Programming.
Feel free to do it...
q
|
38.31 | Picky me... | DECWET::KOSAK | | Mon Aug 17 1987 12:58 | 31 |
| Re .30:
I hope the VAX DOCUMENT developers aren't taking this as lightly
as you seem to be. An *accurate*, high quality corporate logo for
PostScript output should not be something that is left to whoever has
the time to do it. It should be done by the DOCUMENT developers,
approved by corporate graphics (or whoever has responsibility for
making sure we present our corporate identity in a consistent and high
quality fashion), and officially released to all VAX DOCUMENT users.
I hope I don't offend anyone, but I've got to say that the beating
our logo has taken over that past few years is pretty sad. Without
leaving my chair I can find four different versions of our logo
which have been published, and only one of them is correct (according
to the version of the Corporate Identification Manual I have).
I'll admit that I've committed this sin as well. The latest version
of the DECwest Illustration Guide contains an imperfect version of our
logo available in our GRED library. Even though it's the best one
currently available for PostScript output, it still isn't as good as
it should be. I have just deleted it, and am going to wait until we
can produce a correct version, or one is provided for us. I hope
others will do the same.
Could anyone from CUP Engineering provide an update on the approach
that is being taken to provide an accurate logo for PostScript
output?
I'll get off my soapbox now, thanks for listening.
-- Craig
|
38.32 | Postscript Pic. - fyi | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph, and the world glyphs with u,... | Tue Aug 18 1987 14:02 | 56 |
| <<< SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]POSTSCRIPT.NOTE;1 >>>
-< PostScript >-
================================================================================
Note 26.0 PostScript Digital Logo 2 replies
PAUPER::LOMICKA 49 lines 13-SEP-1985 17:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^P *** Change to real control-P and use with ascii.ps to execute example below.
% digital_logo.ps by Roy Lomicka, September 13, 1985
%
% adapted from similar program by Brian Reid, Stanford
%
% refinements to better match the artwork in the DEC
% Identification Manual supplied by Scott Robinson
/digital-logo-font /Helvetica-Bold findfont
[35 34 div .65 mul 0 0 .75 0 0] makefont def
/box-width 35 34 div .405 mul def
/box-pitch box-width .85 div def
/digital-logo-box {
gsave
box-pitch box-width sub 2 div -.225 rmoveto
box-width 0 rlineto
0 1 rlineto box-width neg 0 rlineto
closepath fill
grestore
gsave
dup stringwidth pop box-pitch exch sub 2 div 0 rmoveto
1 setgray
show
grestore
box-pitch 0 rmoveto
} def
/digital-logo {
% draws digital logo with left baseline point at current point with
% specified height using current color for boxes and white letters
% and moves current point in x direction by about 3.433 times height
currentfont exch % save font
matrix currentmatrix exch % save matrix
dup scale
digital-logo-font setfont
0 1 6 {(digital) exch 1 getinterval digital-logo-box} for
setmatrix % restore matrix
setfont % restore font
} def
% example of mixing logo with ascii text
5 characters-per-inch
ascii
Our logo (^P *** Change to real control-P.
24 point digital-logo ascii
) contains 7 letters.
|
38.33 | Close, but... | DECWET::KOSAK | | Tue Aug 18 1987 16:35 | 15 |
| I just took a look at the logo posted in .32. It's very close,
but still not correct. Close comparison with the official logo
will reveal that the "t" is quite a bit different, as are the curved
portions of the "d" and "g". The weight of all the letters is a
bit too heavy as well. These are the same problems I had with the
logo we did in GRED, and they all stem from using the Helvetica
typeface.
This version is *much* better than the one currently being provided
for DOCUMENT's PostScript output (the code is shorter than the
GRED version too), and could serve as a replacement until a
truly correct logo can be provided (don't forget to add the "TM"
though).
-- Craig
|
38.34 | An official effort is under way | VAXUUM::DEVRIES | M.D. -- your Device Doctor | Mon Aug 31 1987 11:01 | 7 |
| I have heard from a source in TBU that they are working on an
officially-supported DEC logo for PostScript. I don't know what
approach they are taking, but since they are the central source
of fonts and PostScript support for the corporation, I suspect they
are committed to doing it right.
--Mark
|