| Powerbuilder is a very slick 4GL that runs on Windows 3.0 and generates
client/server applications. I have competed with Rdb against the
combination of Sybase/Powerbuilder twice, both unsuccessfully. When
the customer saw Powerbuilder, they wanted the database that it ran
with (Sybase, not Rdb). Rally, Powerhouse, et al are no competition at
all if the customer wants Windows client/server.
I don't know if they are porting to Rdb, but we should pay them to do
it.
Allbase is, I believe, a port of Interbase, which was developed by a
person who left DEC Rdb development. As such, it has some similarities
to Rdb/ELN.
Al
|
| I have come across Powerbuilder three times in the last week, two were
competitive and one was rather benign.
Regardless, the thing looks very slick. The demo I saw was a sales
tracking system. The demo starts with a bunch of yearly totals,
something like:
year wholesale retail other total
1987 12345.67 9876.45 23456.78 34234.56
1988 45634.98 2121.56 56435.78 87654.12
1989 12345.67 9876.45 23456.78 34234.56
1990 12345.67 9876.45 23456.78 34234.56
1991 12345.67 9876.45 23456.78 34234.56
By "double-clicking" on "1990" he got a breakdown by Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.
By then "double-clicking" on one of the quarters hea got a further
breakdown. My question is "How can they do something like this without
some kind of intelligence in the product or programming?" If they
can't, why do customers fall for it?
Or am I missing something?
Bruce
|
| Bruce,
I have seen products that do things like you describe. They are usually
an Executive Information System product. The last one I saw was from
Commshare - Arthur Tracking on the PC. You are correct about there
being a lot of work done behind, but a lot of the functionality is
"canned". A tool can infer a lot by the way the database is set up. If
you have a calculated field made up of the sum of 4 quarters, why
wouldn't a tool automated that breakdown?
|