| > Does anyone have any information about SQL/400 (or what ever it is
> called) ?
Try the Competitive Hotline: DTN: 297-3333
IBM will position the AS400 system as a Database Machine. However, our
TPC-A database benchmark results are very strong compared to IBM.'s.
IBM's journalling called Commitment Control is not very efficient, and
many customers don't user it.
The SQL interface to the AS400 Db is relatively new and not that efficient - be
careful about saying this though.
There are very few 3rd Party CASE, SW development and 4GL tools available
that work with the AS400 database. Position it as a closed architecture and
play up the number of tools available to work with Rdb.
Play up the SQL Services interface and the ability to develop PC Client Server
applications as well as existing PC applications that have access to Rdb
data (DECquery, DECreport, Lotus, Excel, FOCUS, Paradox).
I have heard that the AS400 database is not truly a relational database
however I don't have the technical details to back this up.
Mention the advanced database management and creation tools available with
Rdb - RMU Utilities, RdbExpert, Graphical Schema Editor, InstantSQL, DECtrace.
Don't forget Rdb On-Line Backup and sophisticated recovery capabilities - like
restore to a specified time etc. In the past the AS/400 has had a terrible
reputation for extremely slow recovery times when disk failures have occurred.
Also, mention high availability of Rdb data through clustering.
If the customer likes the automatic spreading of data across disks associated
with the AS/400, talk about Disk Striping.
Hope this helps,
Steve Farlow @STO
DTN: 445-7212
|