T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1129.1 | VAXATTRACT for HP Program | MRKTNG::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg DTN 264-2269 TTB1-5/B3 | Thu Apr 02 1992 16:53 | 10 |
| Back in the old days, when we initiated the 'VAXATTRACT" Program for
HP, we used the ASK MANMAN environment as a good indicator of the
value of the migration program. There were a number of tools developed
to help support the migration effort, many from 3rd party vendors.
I've been away from that program for a few years now, but perhaps
someone can provide a pointer to these migration tools.
Mark
|
1129.2 | | NOVA::FEENAN | Jay Feenan, Rdb/VMS engineering | Thu Apr 02 1992 17:49 | 12 |
| As far as "old technology", besides the data model just showing the features
put into the product over the last two-three years shows that it is not....
It is based on the same record subsystem as Rdb/VMS and has benefited in
the same way as Rdb over the past few years in terms of performance.
Also look into the reorganization facility that has been put into the product.
Schema changes can be made as easy/easier than most relational systems on
the market. A big plus in the real world once you get past the data model
arguements.
-Jay
|
1129.3 | The customer's concerns are after the conversion | 16625::WALLIS | Barry L. Wallis | U.S. Production Systems Resource Center | DTN 535-4313 | Fri Apr 03 1992 00:16 | 22 |
| Re: .1
Mark,
I looked at the dates on some of those notes. You really did mean the "old"
days ;-). I don't think that the customer is as concerned about the migration
tools as they are about tools to access the MANMAN database once it is
migrated.
Re: .2
Jay,
I don't have any problem selling a product based on VAX/DBMS. However, I did
want to accurately state the customer's concern. If we decide to go after this
business, I will certainly point out Digital's investment in continuing
VAX/DBMS technology. I think I'll find that this is a perception problem rather
than a "real-world" problem.
- Barry (teaching customers to use the right tool for the job)
|
1129.4 | Image was similar to DBMS, but less functional | WIBBIN::NOYCE | Mar 28: time to plant snow peas? | Fri Apr 03 1992 17:32 | 7 |
| Does Turbo-Image have anything more than the name in common with Image,
which was HP's version of the Total DBMS?
Total provides a limited form of the same database model that VAX DBMS
implements. In Total, as I recall, a record can *either* own sets, *or*
be a member of sets, but not both. There are no relational features at
all. If Turbo-Image is similar, you might find a diplomatic way to
point out that the customer is advancing into the 80's...
|
1129.5 | | WILBRY::BOURDEAU | RdbStar Product Mgr DTN:264-6050 | Tue Apr 07 1992 23:23 | 4 |
| ASK recommends a third party product called UDMS (I believe) to Access
DBMS, Rdb, and RMS files. I've never seen the product, but I here it
works reasonably well. I don't know the name of the company. Try your
local ASK rep for additional details
|