| Title: | DEC Rdb against the World |
| Moderator: | HERON::GODFRIND |
| Created: | Fri Jun 12 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Feb 23 1995 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1348 |
| Total number of notes: | 5438 |
Hi:
The following info. is required in a tender for a DBMS. We would like
to propose Rdb/VMS.
1 Max databases spanned by one update -
2 Max databases opended by one query -
3 Max tables in a join -
4 Max databases per server -
5 Max database size -
6 Max tables per database -
7 Max columns per table -
8 Max indices per table -
9 Max rows per table -
10 Max columns per composite index -
11 Max indexed column size -
12 Max column size -
13 Max row size -
14 Max characters per database object name -
Appr if someone can point me to a note/query which has the answers to
the above questions.
Thks in advance,
Mike
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1124.1 | That's from Sybase, right? | SUOSW3::KAISER | Who will stay...? | Mon Mar 30 1992 14:54 | 7 |
Hey, are you competing with Sybase? I have a Sybase marketing flyer in front of me. On the last page there is a table with numbers and limitations concerning the database and the tables. Your list of question does match this table exactly. Even the order is the same! But if you read the SPD and the Rdb doc set you will see that Rdb will be better in most questions. -Hans | |||||
| 1124.2 | SYBASE...?...maybe.. | ZPOVC::MICHAELLEE | Tue Mar 31 1992 05:22 | 14 | |
Not sure whether Sybase is in the picture yet. Its an RFI docyument
which we need to submit to the customer by end April in order to at
least 'qualify' for the tender proposal stage which comes after April.
I suppose the cust. has to make use of someone else's DBMS limitations
as a means of comparison. The problem with the Rdb spd is that it lacks
most of the numbers that are requested. Any document/source where I
could refer to for those numbers?
Thks again,
Mike
| |||||