[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ulysse::rdb_vms_competition

Title:DEC Rdb against the World
Moderator:HERON::GODFRIND
Created:Fri Jun 12 1987
Last Modified:Thu Feb 23 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1348
Total number of notes:5438

877.0. "ORACLE_DB2 with DECnet/SNA Gtwy ?" by GRANPA::FOWUSU () Fri Mar 01 1991 20:42

    I need information on ORACLE-DB2 interoperability using 
    Digital's DECnet/SNA Gateway-ST or -CT. Anything you 
    can share, about your experience or your customers' with these
    products with these products will be appreciated.
    
    Francis Owusu 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
877.1SQL*Connect suggests the CTBROKE::THOMASTue Mar 05 1991 23:5527
    ORACLE usually recommends that customers use an Interlink gateway
    rather than one of our gateways.  But there's no reason why you 
    couldn't use either the ST or the CT gateway.  ORACLE provides
    interoperability with DB2 using their networking product, SQL*Net,
    and their DB2 access product, SQL*Connect for DB2.  SQL*Net provides
    a transparency layer for ORACLE products.  It can layer on most any
    kind of network, including DECnet, TCP/IP, and SNA.  ORACLE systems
    can speak to other ORACLE systems pretty much transparently using
    SQL*Net.  A VMS-based ORACLE system can also speak to an MVS-based 
    SQL*Connect system, which will translate requests into DB2.  
    SQL*Connect can be accessed from SQL*Plus, ORACLE's end-user query 
    tool, but it cannot be accessed from SQL*Forms, ORACLE's 4GL 
    environment.  SQL*Connect can be used to update a DB2 database from
    the VAX, but in order to do so, the DB2 database must first be 
    duplicated in ORACLE on MVS (yes, that's right -- you must install
    ORACLE on MVS in order to update DB2).  The updates are first made
    to the ORACLE/MVS system, then the updates are transferred to DB2.
    
    ORACLE recommends the Interlink gateway because SQL*Connect is a 
    slow product, and they feel it is necessary to use a channel-attach
    gateway in order to provide acceptable performance.  You'd probably
    be wise to recommend the CT rather than the ST.
    
    (By chance, would your customer be interested in looking at Rdb?
    VIDA for DB2 provides a much more comprehensive and efficient 
    solution.)