| Ok, get set for the list of participants (november 1990, 39 members)
Amdahl, Arix, AT&T, Bull S.A., Computer Associates, Compaq, Contol Data
Corp., Data General, Digital Equipment, Fujitsu America, Hewlett
Packard, Hitachi Ltd, IBM, ICL, Informix, Ingres, Intel, ITOM International
Corp, MIPS Computer, Mitsubishi Electric Corp, NCR, NEC Corp, OKI
Electric Industry, Olivetti, Oracle, Prime Computer, Pyramid
Technology, Sequent Computer, Sequoia Systems, Siemens A.G., Software
A.G., Stratus Computer, Sun Microsystems, Sybase, Tandem Computers,
Teradata Corp., Unify Corp, Unisys, Wang Laboratories.
Founder was Omri Selin from ITOM International. Don't know of any
positions of companies within the TPC.
Henny Olthof, TP-DB Netherlands
|
| re: 823.8 TPC-B results, not accepted yet
� As far as I know, Oracle has only published TPC-B numbers until now.
� And even those numbers are still not accepted by the TPC as they did
� not pass all the test they need to (like ACID, clause 2).
�
� Henny Olthof, TP-DB Netherlands
What does "not accepted by the TPC" mean, and what are the competitive sales
implications? Is there some public, on-the-record comment by some TPC
official to that effect? Whose numbers *have* been accepted?
Even if our 4.0 numbers have been "accepted," I don't know that we'd want to
brag about it. I'm still waiting for the "real" 4.0 numbers, i.e. the ones
that show it faster than 3.1, not slower, to come out.
We need help telling the customers that Rdb is a wise choice.
Bruce
|