T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
744.1 | What I've learnd in a Codd/Date seminar | SUOSW3::KAISER | working... | Mon Sep 24 1990 16:55 | 11 |
| I've been on a Codd&Date seminar in Munich this year, where Colin White did a
comparison of various DBMS. Here's a list of systems that have 2PC:
- CA-DB:STAR (Computer Associates)
- NonStop/SQL (Tandem)
- Ingres/Star (RTI) (has a 'user managed 2PC' ?)
- SQL Server (Sybase, Microsoft)
(2PC can be implemented using DB library calls)
Hope that helps
-Hans
|
744.2 | Any more info? | ROMSLS::FERRARISMA | Murphy was an optimist | Tue Sep 25 1990 11:36 | 9 |
| Thanks Hans for your reply. Do you have something more specific (i.e.
technical characteristics). For exaample, I believe that "user managed
2PC" means that the user has to write his own coordinator and manage
the various actions involved in 2PC. Is this true? Does anybody else
have this kind of information?
ADVthanksANCE,
Max
|
744.3 | Yes, as I understand it | SUOSW4::KAISER | working... | Wed Sep 26 1990 12:54 | 7 |
| >> For exaample, I believe that "user managed
>> 2PC" means that the user has to write his own coordinator and manage
>> the various actions involved in 2PC. Is this true?
Yes, maybe someone who knows Ingres or ULTRIX/SQL can tell us more about this.
-Hans
|