T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
583.1 | Competitive update 2/29/90? | ODIXIE::BONE | Osteopath | Mon Feb 26 1990 20:08 | 1 |
|
|
583.2 | not quite | AUNTB::KULVETE | | Mon Feb 26 1990 20:13 | 7 |
| re <<< Note 583.1 by ODIXIE::BONE "Osteopath" >>>
-< Competitive update 2/29/90? >-
Not in depth enough ... the Ingres/Rdb comparison document had topics
such as architecture, database structure, storage structure, indices,
views, security etc. etc. ... 36 pages in all!!!
|
583.3 | I found some info | AUNTB::KULVETE | | Tue Feb 27 1990 16:50 | 1 |
| FYI, I found some information in the BROKE::DB_COMPETITIVE_HELP notes file.
|
583.4 | See the PW Report, too. | CLO::MOLLEY | | Sun Mar 04 1990 18:30 | 9 |
| Dave,
There is a Paine-Webber report available that gives competitive info on
ORACLE from both a product technical perspective and a company
financial perspective. I think you can order reprints.
Regards,
Nik
|
583.5 | PW too old | MAIL::DUNCANG | Gerry Duncan @KCO - DTN 452-3445 | Sun Mar 04 1990 19:19 | 3 |
| The PW report is too old. I personally would not send it.
-- gerry
|
583.6 | No PW | NOVA::BOOTH | What am I?...An Oracle? | Fri Mar 09 1990 16:08 | 5 |
| For what it's worth, don't use the Paine Webber report. Instead, just
give a copy of Oracle's annual report to the VP of Finance. Let them
find the "warts" for themselves.
---- Michael Booth
|