T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
558.1 | HP's "Ingres 4GL?" | SRFSUP::LANGSTON | ORACLE is not your friend. | Tue Jan 30 1990 17:45 | 5 |
| Too bad we can't sell the Ingres Tools (on the PC) for Rdb; we
could just include it in our proposal package.
I just saw in the NewsBooth that HP has something called Ingres 4GL.
Is that available to run on a PC or is it just from a terminal?
|
558.2 | Focus ? | MAIL::DUNCANG | Gerry Duncan @KCO | Wed Jan 31 1990 12:51 | 9 |
| I usually spec Focus in this situation because:
- Focus runs on the PC
- Focus will use Rdb at the DSRI level
- Focus can read CDD+
- Focus will soon be available on RISC/Ultrix
- Focus has very good integration with ALL-IN-1
Call you local Focus rep for more details.
|
558.3 | A Suggestion | CLYPPR::BOOTH | What am I?...An Oracle? | Wed Jan 31 1990 16:31 | 13 |
| Ingres on the PC is not in sync with Ingres on the VAX.
HP offers Allbase/4GL on both Unix and MPE-XL machines. The development
set is called Allbase/4GL. That 4GL is also known as TODAY from
Computer Power. It does run on PCs. I don't know if talks from PC to
HP. Interestingly, TODAY also supports Rdb databases on the VAX.
If there are lots of PCs, you might try The Synergist by Gateway
Systems in Okemos, Michigan. That will let you develop on a PC, port
the application to a VAX, and cooperatively process between an Rdb
database and the native Synergist on PCs under R:base.
---- Michael Booth
|
558.4 | "Would you believe Cognos, Mr. Customer?" | SRFSUP::LANGSTON | ORACLE is not your friend. | Thu Feb 01 1990 02:28 | 32 |
| I told them that a 4GL on the PC was a way to go and explained the
trade-off involved: two application development environments, possible
more network traffic, less performance.
I suggested that if they wanted they could develop a 3GL application
with SQL/Services.
Finally, I suggested they would get best performance and all the
benefits of VAX/VMS and a single environment with PCs emulating
terminals.
He wanted to know, of course, which 4GL we "recommend" for the PC.
I said "Ingres Tools for Rdb," explained briefly how it works with
Rdb and, doggonit, he said "Oh yes, we've seen Ingres Tools. We
like them, and, if it were up to me right now, I'd probably choose
their database, as well."
Well it's not up to only him (he's the application development manager)
but I'm sure he's got a say.
Now we're going to have Cognos talk to them tomorrow (Thursday).
The sales rep has worked before with Cognos and feels somewhat
comfortable. I couldn't get the team to go with Focus, which
evidently does work on a PC and does talk across DECnet to Rdb on a
VAX.
My sense is that we're going to lose ground because we can't provide
the applications on the PCs. We're running out of time and don't
think we can introduce any more third parties without a revolving
door.
Hmmm... lessons learned.
|
558.5 | Try IBI in New York | MAIL::DUNCANG | Gerry Duncan @KCO | Thu Feb 01 1990 21:21 | 6 |
| I just alkded to the Focus rep I work with. He suggested you call
Focus folks in NY who specialize in VAX: Dan Ortoloni 212-736-4433
(heavy duty Focus VAX person) and Melissa Webster (VP of VAX division).
He seems to think you should still consider Focus.
-- gerry
|
558.6 | Questions | PNKFLD::BOOTH | What am I?...An Oracle? | Thu Feb 01 1990 23:27 | 11 |
| What does it mean "I couldn't get the team to go along with Focus?" Who
on "the team" is "the sage of the 4GL market?" Why do these people feel
more comfortable with Ingres, a competitor, than Focus, a CMP?
Why is a recommendation of incompatible versions of Ingres tools a
better choice than identical Focus versions that can communicate with
Rdb?
Am I missing something?
---- Michael Booth
|
558.7 | Ingres Tools or Focus | TRCO01::MCMULLEN | | Fri Feb 02 1990 14:56 | 16 |
| Does FOCUS really work in the nice CLIENT/SERVER - PC/VAX relationship.
From talking to the folks from IBI, I understand that FOCUS must
be on the VAX and the PC. FOCUS on the pc passes the request to
the VAX FOCUS which then extracts data into flat files, which are
then copied down to the PC. This is not what I call CLIENT/SERVER.
Check out the prices of all the FOCUS tools.
Also beware of INGRES Tools...DANGER....DANGER....DANGER. New note
to follow soon. If you have any experience with INGRES tools for
Rdb give me a call as soon as possible please.
regards,
Ken McMullen
dtn 637-3330
|
558.8 | They use Kermit | MAIL::DUNCANG | Gerry Duncan @KCO | Fri Feb 02 1990 18:20 | 9 |
| The FOCUS rep I talked to yesterday told me they were working on
a PCSA version which would move closer to client/server. He told
me they currently use Kermit or other similar file xfr programs
to move data between the PC and the VAX so that matches .7's info.
It would be nice if they used SQL*services but who knows.
-- gerry
|
558.9 | cooperative processing... | SRFSUP::LANGSTON | ORACLE is not your friend. | Fri Feb 02 1990 20:01 | 24 |
| An update:
We had Cognos come in yesterday and present Powerhouse. The customer
seems to like it. The rep had been talking to the Cognos rep and
felt it was too late to bring in another vendor (like Focus). The
Cognos guys did a good job of differentiating Powerhouse from Ingres's
tools.
I will tell the rep that Focus would probably have been a better
choice (if for competitive reasons only?) than Cognos or Ingres (which
had been recommended to me by a fellow Sales Support-er -- I'll tell
him, too) and recommend he consider Focus in the future.
More important, *I'll* know now that Focus is the first choice, even
though Ingres apparently is the only vendor whose tools can provide Rdb
access from PC (DOS)-developed applications. Right? (I know about
dBASE.)
Bruce
PS: Are we encouraging vendors more friendly and less competitive than
Ingres to make their tools use SQL/Services?
|
558.10 | Yes | PNKFLD::BOOTH | What am I?...An Oracle? | Fri Feb 02 1990 22:55 | 6 |
| Yes, we are actively "encouraging" vendors to talk from PC to Rdb on
the VAX.
If you want specifics, talk to Ken Morse.
---- Michael Booth
|