|
I just read a blurb in that "bastion of journalistic respectability,"
Digital Review, that Oracle was beginning work on an RMS interface,
but no mention was mad of Rdb.
It would seem counter to O's philosophy, I think, to build to Rdb.
Bob
|
| Same issue...Possible Oracle perspective:
SQL*Forms is not effectively competitive with 3rd party 4GLs that
currently run on Rdb. Oracle generally wins with it because of its
tight integration with other Oracle tools. If Oracle migrated it to run
on Rdb, they would have to rewrite to get much greater functional
capability from the product.
Secondly, to be effective, they would have to interface to CDD/Plus.
That would hardly help them sell their proprietary dictionary.
Thirdly, Oracle would have to go to totally new pricing schemes. Their
4GL is currently rather cheap with the RDBMS being the big ticket item.
Migrating their tools would force them to a low-cost RDBMS, high-cost
tools situation to maintain their profitability.
Fourthly, Oracle's direction is vertical applications and their own
hardware. Migrating their tools seems diametrically opposed to their
corporate goals. It would really hurt them as the tools would not
leverage any account control, and account control is a cornerstone of
the Oracle philosophy.
---- Michael Booth
|