| Neil,
A benchmark was just completed out here in the Southwest that compared
Ingres, Sybase and Rdb. It's not your 'typical' database application
in that it tests loading data into a file, with no overhead for
users. (Basically, it tests raw database performance). To pass
the test, a database had complete in 80 minutes. They were using
the latest versions of Sybase and Ingres (pre-release, I believe...as
a matter of fact, our own competitive group doesn'y have the releases
that this team used. Wall clock times to complete the test were:
Ingres - 72 minutes
Sybase - 76 minutes
Rdb - 70 minutes 59 seconds.
Impressive huh? We're going to do another test in which we strip
the extra 'features' that Sybase and ingres used and run it again.
After that, we will probably publish something and with the help
of database systems, disseminate the information.
Would this help?
Cheers,
Gil
South Central Area
OLTP/Database Area Sales Support
|
| Neil,
Remember me? The one who got thir rented car towed in VAO. I am
in a similar boat. We are against SYBASE and ORACLE and I need
a publishable benchmark even a DB/CR on a VAX. Hopefully, it will
be a clustered environment so we would really shine.
Same industry, hospitals, but this is possible new business.
Have you got a copy of DEC/Computing 14/12/88. Giving independent
results of databases on a common benchmark but not all on VAX.
It's not bad and has been published.
Linda
|
| Speaking of going up against S & O:
My customer is comtemplating a move from UserWare International's
Userbase to a relational database -based system.
We're hoping that O's woes on clusters will bounce them from the
competition. And that Sybase's requirement for a VAX to serve will
gong them. But just in case our customer is wowed by O's legendary
wooing or somehow convinced that it's worth their while to give
Sybase the deal, I'd like a copy of the aforerequested publishable
benchmark, too. (I'm assuming said bm exists.)
-bruce
|