| Firstly, is this a Burroughs A-Series DMSII or 1900-Series ?
For the A-Series, here's some info:
Closer to CODASYL than relational. A Semantic Data Model (SIM) has
been built on top of DMSII. It supports an object-oriented database
type, which makes implementation of ad-hoc-applications easy.
DMSII has a high-level language programming interface. You say things
like "FIND STUDENT WHERE STUD-NO = WS-STUD-NO" in COBOL. All major
Burroughs languages supported.
Advantages: Stable, bugfree, high performance (used to be hard to
beat in benchmarks, but makes poor use of todays vast memories),
fully featured recovery/rebuild, online backup.
Disadvantages: The SIM implementation is a big clumsy on top of
DMS, tools are old and with incompatible user interfaces, no good
Data Dictionary, no distributed Db (who has?), no 3rd party
applications, 4GL LINC (from NZ) can not share Db.
|
| DMSII is not a relational Db. It does not follow any 'standard'.
Regarding LINC and DMSII, my info is a year old, but at that time
LINC could not coexist on an existing Db. LINC had to generate the
Db itself and you could not have other programs use the Db. There
were plans to change that, but I don't know what happened. LINC
did not use SIM at all and surely doesn't today either.
If you are in a competetive situation with a LINC system, I don't
think you should aim at DMSII. To the designer/programmer/user,
DMSII is totally invisible. It is a good Db system, but it is LINC
you are facing.
My view of LINC is that it has a nice way of looking at a business
application and is a pretty complete 4GL tool. Its big disadvantages
are its lack of communication with other systems and its use of
nothing else than Burroughs terminals. Performance also used to
be a weak side. It handled many users pretty poorly.
Hope this helps.
Daniel
|
| I put together a bid for converting a customer from DMSII to RDB.
Now, that was what the customer asked for. What I wanted to propose
was to convert them to DBMS since there was a closer match there.
When I was doing my research, I found experienced people in the
CONVERSION Notes file (KETJE::CONVERSION).
You may also want to call Bob Hanson @KYO (DTN 323-4053). He's
ex-Burroughs and may be able to help
|