T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
95.1 | ME ALSO | LARVAE::RIDGWAY | | Thu Mar 31 1988 19:56 | 4 |
| I would also like to know about Oracle/VMS and Oracle/Unix as I
am competing against HP.
Gina
|
95.2 | 80 user Oracle: VAX vs. HP | HSKSA1::PAAKKARINEN | Our dedicated Sales Force... | Thu Apr 07 1988 00:53 | 16 |
| Me, too.
I've just got an Invitation to tender (by 15th April, 1988) for
a system with 80 SIMULTANEOUS ORACLE-users and 1 GB disk-space.
Competition is HP and IBM (with Oracle).
Any experience on :
- how to WIN
- HP tactics
- performance comparisons
- is benchmarking good idea ?
Regards,
Jari
|
95.3 | Compulsory or Voluntary | QUILL::BOOTH | A Career in MISunderstanding | Mon Apr 11 1988 16:16 | 7 |
| Are we competing voluntarily or are customers requiring the ORACLE
product?
In other words, are we defaulting to ORACLE in competitive Unix
situations or is an ORACLE solution being demanded of us?
Inquiring minds want to know.
---- Michael Booth
|
95.4 | - Oracle is a MUST-spec - | HSKSA1::PAAKKARINEN | Our dedicated Sales Force... | Sat Apr 16 1988 22:13 | 17 |
| Michael,
In my case the customer has MUSTs like "Ethernet" and "ORACLE-
environment". Perhaps some ideas on "vendor-independence..."
and PC-version/-integration lies behind this Oracle-spec.
I would certainly sell rdb, but in this case it would damage
our chances severily. So, let's live in the real world.
Best regards,
Jari
PS
I've enjoyed very much about your noting - it's honest. Please
go on noting !
|