| re: 71.0, ORACLE User #'s on VAX 8300/8500's
In my (very limited) experience, this is impossible to calculate
without knowing what the application is doing, especially how complex
the queries, views, updates, etc. are.
I've seen a 780 that was able to support 25 users and an 8200 that
couldn't adequately support 1 (one) user with ORACLE-based applications.
If you're trying to sell ORACLE, then STOP WHAT YOU'RE DOING AND THINK
AGAIN !!!! Once you've lost the database (repeat after me, choir) you've
lost control of the account. If your customer likes ORACLE so much, tell
your customer to get ORACLE to do this dirty work for them. This is the
software equivalent of helping to size IBM hardware for your customer.
If you're trying to beat ORACLE, then size the application using Rdb,
and make ORACLE size their hardware platform. If theirs is smaller, make
them benchmark it against Rdb.
Regards,
Larry.
|
|
While I appreciate the attempt to enlighten me and, indeed,
any attempt to help, I would like to clarify a few things:
1) It wasn't my intent to ask for some table of
machine vs. user load for Oracle. I was trying to ask for
literature - "hardware configuration, benchmark application
description ... or rationale for calculations". Serious
benchmarks are always performed for some small subset of the
infinite number of applications and configurations that might
exist, yet it trivializes the subject to say that no reasonable
generalizations can be drawn since every application has its own
qualities.
2) I discuss the subject of selling a competitor's product in
Note 102.14.
|