T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
389.1 | Symbol Generator coming soon... | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2779.50 since I quit smoking. | Mon Dec 03 1990 10:05 | 19 |
| Hi,
I'm afraid that the symbol generator isn't available as a
standalone tool. In our effort to make it more user friendly and to
fix bugs it has become dependant on the latest version of VAX DOCUMENT.
For example, it's no longer executed as a doctype (SYMGEN). Now, it's
executed by enter the command:
$ DOCUMENT/GENERATE_SYMBOL/PREFIX=your_prefix filename
We were also able to get it to generate symbols for files included
using <ELEMENT> tags in the profile file and on files included with the
<INCLUDE> tag.
I'm not sure about the availability of the latest field test update
software (T2.0-2) but if you contact me by mail or phone I'll see what
can be done.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
389.2 | DOCTOR/ONLINE ? | IJSAPL::KLERK | My cat is object oriented | Tue Dec 11 1990 12:53 | 13 |
| Though perhaps not perfect, you may want to look at DOCTOR/ONLINE
that adds labels and even <reference>s to pop up elements that had
none specified in the text.
See IJSAPL::PSQ:[PUBLIC.SOURCES.DOCTOR]*.*
Use DOCTOR_NOCMS.EXE if you haven't got DEC/CMS installed on your
system (or satellite). A .PS file as well as DECW$BOOK is available
to read the documentation. Don't forgot /VERSION_1 if you process
files for DOCUMENT V1.2 (default is /NOVERSION_1, i.e. V2.0 which
also needs labels on <SUBHEADn>s).
Theo
|
389.3 | DOCTOR works! | DLOPAS::FSDB71::DAVIDSON | Bill 'RED' Davidson @ DLO / DTN=486-6339 | Wed Feb 06 1991 11:18 | 10 |
| DOCTOR is a life saver...
I've been using the DOC/GEN stuff (see .1) with limited success - a few wholes
in the symbol generator and other problems with the FT have prevented documents
from being prepared.
I copied DOCTOR to my system yesterday and was finally able to build my
document into bookreader using VAX DOC V1.2B.
Thanks for the help!!!
|
389.4 | what holes ? | VAXUUM::UTT | Mary Utt | Wed Feb 06 1991 12:15 | 11 |
| >> a few wholes
>> in the symbol generator
Gee, 'whole' was our goal...:-)
Please post any problems (holes) you have encountered with the symbol
generator here.
Thanks,
Mary
|