T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
367.1 | Not quite coded right? | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2608.50 since I quit smoking. | Fri Aug 10 1990 14:51 | 7 |
| I believe that the correct way to do what you want is:
<HEAD1>(Head title<FOOTREF>(1)\hd_sym)
<FOOTNOTE_TEXT>(1\Text for the footnote)
<P>
Blah blah blah....<FOOTREF>(1)
|
367.2 | problem related to placement of <online_chunk> ? | VIA::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Fri Sep 07 1990 14:48 | 34 |
| Could an <online_chunk> tag between a reference to a symbol and the place where
the symbol is defined cause one of these "undefined symbol" errors? I got the
following message:
BOOKWRITER ERROR--The following symbols are undefined:
pgid = 388, offset = 28221, symbol = 'EX_FB_ESC'
%DVC-E-OUTPUTFAIL, error writing to output file
-DVC-I-INPUTFILE, input file is: SYS$LOGIN_DEVICE:[EPPES.GRAPHICS]PROFILE.
-DVC-I-ONPAGE, on page [37]
%DVC-E-BOOKABORT, aborting run -- book SYS$LOGIN_DEVICE:[EPPES.GRAPHICS]PROFIL
EPPES job terminated at 7-SEP-1990 13:28:39.65
When I searched my source files for EX_FB_ESC, I came up with the following
coding:
<reference>(ex_fb_esc) illustrates how this escape is used.
<ONLINE_CHUNK>
<EXAMPLE>(Using the FORTRAN Escape Function --440\ex_fb_esc)
<CODE_EXAMPLE>
etc.
I commented the <online_chunk> tag out (not sure why it was there, anyway;
these are not my own files) and I'm currently building the book again to see
whether it made a difference. However, the book takes about 3 hours (elapsed
time) to build...
This is DOCUMENT V1.2-B, by the way, and VMS 5.3.
-- Nina
|
367.3 | <online_chunk> doesn't seem to be the problem after all | VIA::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Fri Sep 07 1990 17:59 | 9 |
| RE .2 - Well, commenting out that <online_chunk> tag didn't help. I still got
the same message. The symbol *is* defined and is only referenced just before
the example, as shown in my previous reply. There are no other references to
it (at least, a search of all the .SDML files didn't turn up any others).
Any suggestions? Oh, I'm using the CUP.TEST_ONLINE doctype, by the way, if that
makes any difference. (And the book built fine for PS output.)
-- Nina
|
367.4 | I'll look into it... | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2653.50 since I quit smoking. | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:43 | 5 |
| Nina, could you send me a pointer to the .SDML file? I'll run some
tests on it here and let you know what I find.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
367.5 | Incorrect use of <ONLINE_CHUNK> tag | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2656.50 since I quit smoking. | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:04 | 7 |
| The problem turned out to be the use of an <ONLINE_CHUNK> tag in a
formal example. Removing it fixed the problem.
As the documentation states, the <ONLINE_CHUNK> tag is NOT to be used
in formal examples and tables.
Wayne
|
367.6 | Yup, it was <online_chunk> after all - but a different one | VIA::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:28 | 10 |
| Since I teach a class on coding SDML files for Bookreader, I'd just like to
state, for the record, that I didn't code this file! (I also mentioned this in
a previous reply.) Must keep my reputation intact, you know... :-) :-)
I'd also like to express my enormous appreciation and gratitude to Wayne for
tracking down the problem. Thanks, Wayne! Now, if you can just do something
about a message that reports "undefined symbol" when it really means "you have
an <online_chunk> where you shouldn't, you dodo!" :-)
-- Nina
|
367.7 | Funny you should ask... | VAXUUM::GRANT | I've saved $2656.50 since I quit smoking. | Wed Sep 12 1990 19:19 | 8 |
| Ask and ye..... whatever.... ;^)
In the next version of the software, the tag translator will check to
see if <ONLINE_CHUNK> tags are coded in formal topics and issue an
error message if so.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
367.8 | Wow, what service! :-) | VIA::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Thu Sep 13 1990 17:45 | 0
|