T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
303.1 | Click on comma! | PEGGYO::FARINA | | Mon Apr 09 1990 17:15 | 22 |
| I'd like to reiterate Bob's request for help. Let me stress that we
are talking about the *same* documment. This is not a second iteration
of this problem.
When the files are processed for PS with CUP_HANDBOOK, we get no comma
in the index. When the exact same files are processed in ONLINE.HAND
for the BOOKREADER, we get this comma (,) in the index. When we click
on the entry, several options are available!
A thorough search was done of the two chapters referenced in the pop-up
window, and then for the rest of the .SDML files. We cannot find any
reason for this. Unfortunately, we are out of time, and this will go
out on the May disk as is.
This has not happened in any of our other books. The chapters in
question are command sections with syntax diagrams, examples and
tables.
We are running VAX DOCUMENT V1.2-B, BOOKREADER V2.0. Log and SDML
files can be made available, if necessary.
Susan
|
303.2 | Need a sample file. | CLOSET::GRANT | I've saved $2425.00 since I quit smoking. | Tue Apr 10 1990 09:09 | 5 |
| Could you send a (hopefully) short .SDML file that I could use for
testing? So far, I haven't had any luck duplicating your problem.
Thanks,
Wayne
|
303.3 | appears to be an indexer bug | RAGMOP::UTT | | Thu Apr 12 1990 15:37 | 15 |
| This appears to be a bug in the V1.2B indexing software and occurs when
the MASTER attribute is used with index entries. This and the problem
reported in note 313 are basically the same. Using files supplied by
Susan Farina (.1) and by Diane Taylor (note 313), we were able to
reproduce the problem for *both* hardcopy and online under 1.2B, but
not under 1.2A (which produced correct indexes).
We will add this bug to the list to be fixed for the next release
of DOCUMENT.
There does not appear (to me) to be any good workaround, other than
removing the MASTER attribute from index entries, or editing the
bogus comma entries out of the xxx_INDEX.TEX file.
Mary
|
303.4 | conditionalizing as a workaround? | VIA::EPPES | I'm not making this up, you know | Thu Apr 12 1990 18:23 | 9 |
| RE .3 --
> There does not appear (to me) to be any good workaround, other than
> removing the MASTER attribute from index entries, or editing the
> bogus comma entries out of the xxx_INDEX.TEX file.
What about conditionalizing the master index entries?
-- Nina
|
303.5 | I'll try conditions and let you know | PEGGYO::FARINA | | Fri Apr 13 1990 11:23 | 13 |
| RE: .3
Thanks, Mary. At least we know what's going on, and can find some way
to make it "liveable."
RE: .4
That's the first thing I thought when I read Mary's note, Nina. Will
conditionals work? I'll give it a try with a sample file and report
back here on how it worked.
Susan
|
303.6 | hardcopy, too | RAGMOP::UTT | | Fri Apr 13 1990 13:31 | 11 |
| Conditionalizing would be fine if the problem were only in the online
indexes BUT (despite the assertion to the contrary in .0) I got the
same results (a bogus comma entry at the top) in *hardcopy* output as
well. I tried both software.reference and cup_handbook doctypes. (If
someone has a file that is OK for hardcopy but not for online, please
send it to me.)
Besides, if there were a lot of MASTER index entries, conditionalizing
them would be an awfully tedious chore.
Mary
|
303.7 | Sorry - missed that comment! | PEGGYO::FARINA | | Fri Apr 13 1990 15:38 | 13 |
| We *do* have a ton of Master entries, Mary, and even though I read that
you had recreated the problem hardcopy, too, it didn't register in my
brain (that's what I get for going out on a Thursday night!). I
haven't *had* to run hardcopy, so I haven't.
What I will do is process the sample file for postscript and check the
pages. If they appear elsewhere in the index, under an entry other
than , (comma) we won't have any problems deleting those entries as you
suggested. We may be losing the equivalent of a cross-reference,
though. I'll let you know what I discover.
Susan
|
303.8 | Solution for extraneous "," in Index | REORG::JALBERT | | Fri May 25 1990 15:09 | 20 |
| RE .3
I do believe I have discovered what is causing the "," in the index.
Upon checking into this I discovered that the entries were all
\begin and \end entries. What causes the comma to come out is when there
is a space between \begin \master. These entries were also not showing up
in the master index so if you were to just delete them they wouldn't
show up anywhere. When you remove the space the entry is then recognized
and the comma goes away. So if you code master index entries with begin and end
ranges as follows:
<x>(Index entry\begin\master)
<x>(Index entry\end\master)
^NOSPACE HERE OR ABOVE
it seems to resolve the problem. I believe one of the writers in our group
has put this in as a QAR. Hope this helps anyone else who may have this
problem.
Sally
|
303.9 | Indexer bugs fixed in next release | CLOSET::GRANT | I've saved $2503.50 since I quit smoking. | Fri Jun 01 1990 17:48 | 23 |
|
Just to provide everyone with the latest status for this note.
The problem with the "," entries in indexes is an Indexer bug and the fix will
be available in the next release. The next release will be the field test
version of VAX DOCUMENT V2.0. Look for announcement of its availability in
either this conference or the CLOSET::DOCUMENT notes conference
A second problem, not reported in this notes conference, has also been fixed
for the next release. It was causing a bookbuild failure during the Index
processing phase. This problem appeared when \<XSORT> was used. For
example:
<x>(Red Apple \<xsort>(Apple) \bold)
would cause the following error message:
%INX-E-BADATTR, illegal tag argument attribute list syntax in tag
<X> (_( SORT="Apple" ,)Red Apple).
%DOC-E-ERROR_INDEXER, Errors found by the indexing facility
Wayne
|